Teams

LCTA40/Tyner/Maybank

2022 USTA 40 & Over Spring · 40 & over Men 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-13vs LCTA40/Hatmaker/AshEastWon 10
W#1 SinglesLance Tyner vs Patrick Stuart6-2, 6-1
2022-03-29vs LCTA40/DERSTINE/DOTYLost 01
L#1 SinglesLance Tyner vs Eric Epstein4-6, 4-6
2022-03-16Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLance Tyner vs Mark Allan - (DQ)1-6, 1-6
2022-03-15Won 10
W#1 SinglesLance Tyner vs Taylor Gillespie6-1, 6-3
2022-02-21vs LCTA40/DERSTINE/DOTYLost 01
L#3 DoublesLance Tyner / David Clark vs Kyle Degarady / Jeffrey Schreiber6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-09vs LCTA40/Morton/CCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn David Pfile / Lance Tyner vs David Kilborn / James Craigie6-3, 6-2
2022-02-02vs LCTA40/Keiper/CTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicholas Connolly / Lance Tyner vs Paul Callander / Eric Goshorn6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & over Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Nicholas Connolly
published
3.59
John David Pfile
published
3.22
Lance Tyner
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.21
Charles Truluck
published 3.5
3.21
George Fullbright
published 3.5
3.20
Art Moore
published 3.5
3.05
Jamie Deveaux
published 3.5
Jeffrey Shealy
published
Paul Baran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Truluck + Jamie Deveaux211254% games−2.7% vs expected
Paul Baran + John David Pfile3545% gamesnot enough data
Lance Tyner + George Fullbright4348% gamesnot enough data
Lance Tyner + Charles Truluck4258% gamesnot enough data
Lance Tyner + John David Pfile3256% gamesnot enough data
George Fullbright + John David Pfile3257% gamesnot enough data
Lance Tyner + Paul Baran213 matchesnot enough data
George Fullbright + Paul Baran213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicholas Connolly
37W–18L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.20
John David Pfile
120W–64L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Lance Tyner
284W–198L career · 7 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Charles Truluck
58W–34L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
George Fullbright
254W–249L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Art Moore
24W–34L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Jamie Deveaux
31W–21L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
Jeffrey Shealy
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paul Baran
28W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.