Teams

SDNC 3.5 WE Scripps Ranch/ Garcia

2024 SoCal Fall Doubles SD WE · SD Women 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-01vs SDNC 3.5 WE KCP/ NelsonSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJennifer Johnson / Kiersten Bousquet vs Maeve Brick / Trudy Fore4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesStacey Griffin / Melanie Bowyer vs Robyn Rice / Amanda Clardy6-3, 6-3
2024-11-17vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ BolelliWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Johnson / Kiersten Bousquet vs Marva Gesell / Klaudia Kapinos6-3, 6-4
2024-11-03vs SD 3.5 CTC-CHS/ LeshSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Johnson / Kiersten Bousquet vs Elizabeth Dahlgren / Yvonne Hwang5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesStacey Griffin / Caresse Muir vs Jennifer Vernallis / Meagan McKissick6-1, 7-5
L#1 DoublesKiersten Bousquet / Jennifer Johnson vs Kristine Walker / Sarah Fontana7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCaresse Muir / Diane Thornton vs Michelle Strachan / Jennifer Bucky2-6, 4-6
2024-10-13vs SDNC 3.5 WE KCP/ NelsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesKiersten Bousquet / Stacey Griffin vs Suzanne E Shupe / Trudy Fore2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-06vs SD 3.5 Mtn View/ FairbankLost 02
L#1 DoublesKiersten Bousquet / Jennifer Johnson vs Debora Rozen / Luisa Garcia de la Cabada7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMelanie Bowyer / Stacey Griffin vs Elsa Dominguez / Natalia Rodriguez Oteiza3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesKirsten Barton / Caresse Muir vs Amanda Barnard / Jennifer Bucky4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMelanie Bowyer / Stacey Griffin vs Leslie Lee / Amanda Albert6-4, 7-6
L#1 DoublesCaresse Muir / Joanne White vs Amanda Barnard / Michelle Strachan0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKiersten Bousquet / Jennifer Johnson vs Sarah Fontana / Heather Traficonte5-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Kirsten Barton
published
3.26
Diane Thornton
published 3.5
3.09
Kiersten Bousquet
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.07
Melanie Bowyer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Caresse Muir
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Sally Myungok Yeem
published
3.00
Maureen Ford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caresse Muir + Kiersten Bousquet101145% gamesnot enough data
Caresse Muir + Melanie Bowyer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kirsten Barton
16W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Diane Thornton
14W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Kiersten Bousquet
78W–88L career · 7 lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Melanie Bowyer
15W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Caresse Muir
64W–78L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Sally Myungok Yeem
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.02
Maureen Ford
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.