Teams

Nichols

2023 Leon Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-12-04vs Khairallah-BartensWon 20
W#2 DoublesJennifer Larson / Lisa Franson vs Junko Stout / Kristine Khairallah6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMichelle Eubanks / Kristina Reams vs Denean Sykes / Elizabeth Murray6-4, 6-3
2023-11-27vs SukuroWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Emmanuel / Michelle Eubanks vs Farra Noel / Maria Oliver6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Beggs / Denise Whitlock vs KC Slay / Jeanne Dimitri6-3, 6-3
2023-11-13vs Leon/Corbari/Combo18&Over7.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Hawkins / Denise Whitlock vs Rachel Luttrell / Jennifer Winegardner7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStacy Chick / Kristina Reams vs Gina Bell / Nicole Cannon6-7, 5-5
2023-11-06vs StrattonWon 30
W#1 DoublesKim Nichols / Kristina Reams vs Maria Stratton / Juliana Schneider7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Eubanks / Denise Whitlock vs Robyn Wainner / Leslee Simpson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStacy Chick / Susan Ragsdale vs Naama Nagar / Alyssa Atwood6-0, 6-1
2023-11-06vs HerringWon 20
W#2 DoublesLisa Franson / Jennifer Larson vs Sherry Cady / Karen de Cardenas6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKim Nichols / Michelle Eubanks vs Gina Herring / Jasmine Adams6-0, 6-4
2023-10-16vs Khairallah-BartensLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Beggs / Diane Kobes Houston vs Amy Otis / Sheri Freeland4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Eubanks / Susan Emmanuel vs Kristine Khairallah / Fang Liang4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesStacy Chick / Jennifer Larson vs Elizabeth Murray / Xiaobing Zhang2-6, 4-6
2023-10-09vs SukuroWon 21
L#1 DoublesMorgan Scott / Kristina Reams vs Askal Ali / Tracey Cohen6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDenise Whitlock / Lisa Franson vs Jane Sukuro / Olivia McCaffery6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKim Nichols / Kathy Beggs vs Amy Kirkpatrick / KC Slay6-2, 6-1
2023-10-02vs Leon/Corbari/Combo18&Over7.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Hawkins / Susan Ragsdale vs Melissa Powell / Vickie Morgan-Gates3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Emmanuel / Michelle Eubanks vs Pia Lehtonen / Melissa Bunker3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-09-25vs HerringSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSusan Emmanuel / Michelle Eubanks vs Brenda Jahn / Lori Elliott6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathy Beggs / Kristina Reams vs Elaine Rudd / Melissa Johnson3-6, 3-6
2023-09-18vs StrattonWon 20
W#1 DoublesStacy Chick / Susan Ragsdale vs Julie Espy / Juliana Schneider6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichelle Eubanks / Denise Whitlock vs Alyssa Atwood / Nicthe Simpson6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Kathy Beggs
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.64
Stacy Chick
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Michelle Eubanks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Lisa Franson
published
3.45
Jennifer Larson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Kristina Reams
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.09
Susan Emmanuel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Denise Whitlock
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.87
Susan Ragsdale
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jessica Bahorski
published
Kim Nichols
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Beggs + Jennifer Larson7750% games+2.7% vs expected
Susan Emmanuel + Susan Ragsdale141552% games+1.1% vs expected
Susan Ragsdale + Jennifer Larson8848% games−3.7% vs expected
Stacy Chick + Michelle Eubanks432852% games−5.8% vs expected
Michelle Eubanks + Susan Emmanuel5354% gamesnot enough data
Stacy Chick + Jennifer Larson2444% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Eubanks + Jennifer Larson4267% gamesnot enough data
Susan Emmanuel + Jennifer Larson2443% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Beggs
55W–60L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Stacy Chick
59W–50L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Michelle Eubanks
157W–99L career · 12 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
Lisa Franson
31W–24L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
Jennifer Larson
81W–99L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
Kristina Reams
69W–62L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Susan Emmanuel
73W–86L career · 4 lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Denise Whitlock
36W–63L career · 10 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Susan Ragsdale
59W–83L career · 3 lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
2.87
Jessica Bahorski
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Nichols
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.