Teams

Good Touch

Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women Del-Ches-Fri

23 players · average NTRP 3.44 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule23 played
2025-07-11vs Pink PanthersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Holinsky / Jean Haines vs Cindy Bodalski / Joan Mullen6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnne Gaffney / Jennifer Vicinanza vs Tami Sherman / Maria Zecca5-7, 4-6
2025-06-17Won 10
W#4 DoublesGina Amsbaugh / Susan Holinsky vs Carolyn Esbenshade / Karen Greenberg6-4, 7-6
2025-06-17vs NetchixWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Cook / Jennifer Vicinanza vs Marisa Grotell / Nicole Bligh6-4, 7-5
2025-06-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesMarjorie Alleva / Susan Graydon vs Maura Cianciulli / Chris Lucarelli6-3, 6-3
2025-06-13vs Pennypacker Netchix 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesKristy Harper / Christi Krautzel vs Patricia Kelly / Dianne Nicolosi7-5, 6-3
2025-06-10Lost 01
L#4 DoublesSusan Holinsky / Stephanie Collison vs Kelly Jorgensen / Angela Siana5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-06-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Hathaway / Jennifer Vicinanza vs Megan Strobridge / Jill Dzien6-1, 6-0
2025-06-06vs Wayne Swim and TennisLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristi Krautzel / Heather la Scala vs Diane Hodgkiss / Robyn McNeil2-6, 1-2
W#1 SinglesMeng-Hsia Murray-Wu vs Lisa Mambuca6-1, 2-1
L#2 DoublesLing Lee Dietrich / Jennifer Vicinanza vs Judy Horrocks / Judy Christis4-6, 0-2
2025-06-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeslie Smith / Jennifer Vicinanza vs Margaret Richards / Marita Miller4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-05-30vs Simply SmashedSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStacey Carroll / Kathryn Geary vs Patricia Hammer / Lisa Zieske6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAnne Gaffney vs Lois Gianneschi6-7, 6-7
2025-05-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNicole Hathaway / Jennifer Vicinanza vs Sule Hoffman / Su Huang1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-05-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Graydon / Marjorie Alleva vs Marian Inderelst / Roberta Blazejewski6-1, 6-2
2025-05-23vs Mood SwingsLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristy Harper / Christi Krautzel vs Mary Ostoich / Polly Robbins4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathryn Geary / Kari Jarmuz vs Lisa Matherson / Lauren O'Neil3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesStacey Carroll / Jean Haines vs Theresa Smith / Heather Zielinski7-6, 7-6
2025-05-21vs NetchixWon 10
W#2 DoublesErin Sullivan / Susan Graydon vs Maggie Gaines / Sandra Chang6-3, 5-0
2025-05-20vs NetchixWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Lacy / Susan Holinsky vs Maggie Gaines / Sandra Chang6-3, 6-1
2025-05-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesErin Sullivan / Susan Graydon vs Teri Gabrys / Stephanie Gersbach6-0, 6-0
2025-05-16vs GPTL SMASHWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnne Gaffney / Christi Krautzel vs Patricia Picardi / Sue Summers6-2, 6-3
2025-05-06vs Whitford SpringLost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Minter / Susan Holinsky vs Katie Bricker / Alexis Sprecher2-6, 6-7
2025-05-06vs Pennypacker Netchix 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeslie Smith / Jennifer Vicinanza vs MaryLou Henken / Chris Curtis4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-05-02vs Pennypacker Netchix 3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesJean Haines / Susan Holinsky vs Sheila Brova / Julie Chang5-7, 5-2, 1-0
2025-04-29Split 11
L#1 DoublesNicole Hathaway / Jennifer Vicinanza vs Kelly Jorgensen / Susannah Hogan5-7, 4-3, 1-0
W#4 DoublesErin Sullivan / Susan Graydon vs Stacey Angstadt / Crystal Rotto6-2, 6-2
2025-04-25vs Ball WhackersLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristi Krautzel / Anne Gaffney vs Suzy Dowell / Michelle McCall4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTina Mahoney vs Khue Feigenberg2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKari Jarmuz / Kimberly Henning vs Ginger McGeer / Linda Schmucker3-6, 1-6
2025-04-22Split 11
L#1 DoublesNicole Hathaway / Jennifer Vicinanza vs Mary Lacy / Julia Gates2-6, 4-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Holinsky / Amy Snook vs Erica Berstein / Christine Sucher6-1, 6-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Del-Ches-Fri have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Kristy Harper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Beth Dietrich
published 3.5
3.29
Jennifer Astle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.27
Christi Krautzel
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Kathryn Geary
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Jean Haines
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Stacey Carroll
published
3.10
Andrea Small
published 3.5
3.02
Meng-Hsia Murray-Wu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.02
Susan Beauchamp
published
3.01
Anne Gaffney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.01
Susan Graydon
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
2.98
Heather la Scala
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Tina Mahoney
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.84
Jennifer Vicinanza
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
2.81
Susan Holinsky
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.76
Selma Menezes
published
Christie Skinner
published
Kari Jarmuz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Henning
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ling Lee Dietrich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Kim
published
Tara Faccenda
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey Carroll + Beth Dietrich5061% games+11.7% vs expected
Tina Mahoney + Beth Dietrich291356% games+5.6% vs expected
Kathryn Geary + Christi Krautzel4257% games+4.1% vs expected
Susan Holinsky + Jean Haines7649% games+3.9% vs expected
Tara Faccenda + Kimberly Henning7654% games+1.1% vs expected
Christi Krautzel + Jennifer Astle51247% games+0.8% vs expected
Jennifer Vicinanza + Christie Skinner101049% games−0.3% vs expected
Tina Mahoney + Andrea Small8749% games−1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kristy Harper
135W–87L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.48
3.5
Beth Dietrich
53W–27L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Jennifer Astle
126W–131L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Christi Krautzel
43W–50L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Kathryn Geary
47W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Jean Haines
105W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Stacey Carroll
36W–15L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Andrea Small
32W–43L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Meng-Hsia Murray-Wu
52W–57L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Susan Beauchamp
24W–54L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.02
3.5
Anne Gaffney
146W–170L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
Susan Graydon
65W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Heather la Scala
58W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.98
Tina Mahoney
103W–104L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jennifer Vicinanza
63W–64L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Susan Holinsky
106W–97L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
Selma Menezes
49W–40L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Christie Skinner
22W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kari Jarmuz
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Henning
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ling Lee Dietrich
54W–61L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Kim
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tara Faccenda
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.