Teams

UPTA40A/Williams/Kroc

2025 UPTA Adult 40 & Over - USTA · 40 Adult Women - 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-21vs UPTA40A/Foster/Hwy14Lost 13
W#1 DoublesStefanie Chase / Kimberly Halley vs Jane Krason / Yelena Shpakovskiy6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnne Smith / Jennie Morgan vs Juliette Lee / Jennifer Street3-6, 5-3
L#3 DoublesAnne Williams / Allyn Crumpler vs Beth Ouellette / Danielle Henderson1-6, 6-7
L#4 DoublesHeather Gunter / Michelle Vine vs Amanda Powell / Stacey Thomas1-6, 0-6
2025-04-14vs UPTA40A/Ellison/GCCLost 14
W#1 DoublesTiffany Taylor / Allyn Crumpler vs Courtney Couchell / Elizabeth Philmon7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAnne Flink vs Shely Landrum4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJodi Hajosy / Erin Anderson vs Angela Green / Kate Gilreath1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Halley / Heather Gunter vs Ann Ellison / Erin Piepkow2-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesAnnmarie Howard / Suzanne Sanders vs Sherwood Cobb / Betsy Norwood2-6, 0-6
2025-04-09vs UPTA40A/Wilson/BrookstoneLost 05
L#1 DoublesJodi Hajosy / Suzanne Sanders vs Doni Willmering / Marilyn Johnson4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAnne Flink vs Renee Troso6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnne Williams / Kimberly Halley vs Julie Dutterer / Teresa Carson0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennie Morgan / Merle Dunson vs Annette Curin / Ashley Sumner2-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesAngie Hill / Michelle Vine vs Aimee Duffy / Angie McDade3-6, 0-6
2025-03-24vs UPTA40A/McFall/KrocSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAnne Smith / Jennie Morgan vs Jill Wolf / Devin Mequio6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMerle Dunson / Michelle Vine vs Lisa Maurides / Tricia Socash3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAllyn Crumpler / Tiffany Taylor vs Kim McFall / Marci Howle6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesAnnmarie Howard / Angie Hill vs Lyn Boyd / Missy Lawlor4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-17vs UPTA40A/Forbes/CardinalLost 12
W#1 DoublesAllyn Crumpler / Tiffany Taylor vs Caroline Carter / Kyra Roberts6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMerle Dunson / Michelle Vine vs Debbie Etherington / Sara Mower4-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesAnne Flink / Suzanne Sanders vs Susan Krzeminski / Cynthia Forbes1-6, 4-6
2025-03-03vs UPTA40A/Mathias/KrocLost 14
L#1 DoublesJodi Hajosy / Erin Anderson vs Megan Hoffman / Cindy Lee4-6, 1-4
L#1 SinglesAnne Flink vs Cathy Stevens2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTiffany Taylor / Allyn Crumpler vs Vilma Billinis / Joy Ivester3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStefanie Chase / Anne Smith vs Kelsey Mathias / Kelly Gauntner3-6, 6-7
L#4 DoublesSuzanne Sanders / Heather Gunter vs Catie Kelley / Kathleen Reynolds5-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 Adult Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Jennie Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Allyn Crumpler
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Kimberly Halley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Merle Dunson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Jodi Hajosy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Suzanne Sanders
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Anne Smith
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.77
Anne Flink
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.59
Annmarie Howard
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Michelle Vine
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Stefanie Chase
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennie Morgan + Anne Smith8259% games+16.2% vs expected
Suzanne Sanders + Annmarie Howard044 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Sanders + Jodi Hajosy033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennie Morgan
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Allyn Crumpler
14W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Kimberly Halley
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.20
Merle Dunson
21W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Jodi Hajosy
4W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.93
Suzanne Sanders
3W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.91
3.5
Anne Smith
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.78
3
Anne Flink
8W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Annmarie Howard
12W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.59
Michelle Vine
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stefanie Chase
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.