Teams

Lo.Hatlen18M

2024 Capital Mixed 18 & Over · 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesLori Hatlen / Roger Hatlen vs Jeff Owens / Karri Boyer7-5, 6-4
2024-07-14vs Be.Robertson18MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLeigh Barter / Jeffrey Altneu vs Diane Abourisk / Steve Abourisk6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLiz Arcos / Nathan Pool vs Bryan Sutton / Jessica Grossano6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-06-30vs Co.Sutler18MWon 21
W#1 DoublesRoger Hatlen / Rosalyn Hatlen vs Kevin Hampton / April Bazin4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Chan / Leigh Barter vs Robert Caulfield / Christine Hughes6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLiz Arcos / Dylan Miller vs Tim Lyon / April Lyon3-6, 4-6
2024-06-23vs An.Redmond18MWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeigh Barter / Jeffrey Pollack vs Sabrina Hass / Joseph Williamson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRoger Hatlen / Rosalyn Hatlen vs Francisco Burbano / Lauren Redmond6-2, 6-2
2024-06-16Won 20
W#1 DoublesRoger Hatlen / Lori Hatlen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDylan Miller / Rosalyn Hatlen vs Xinyang Dong / Lei Mao6-1, 7-5
2024-06-02vs Me.Everitt18MLost 01
L#1 DoublesRosalyn Hatlen / Andrew Chan vs Mary Jo Dunnington / Stephen Holmes3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Leigh Barter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Roger Hatlen
published
3.81
Jenna Raynor
published
3.69
Lori Hatlen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.34
Rosalyn Hatlen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Jeffrey Pollack
published
3.31
Liz Arcos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
3.05
Nathan Pool
published
2.89
Dylan Miller
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roger Hatlen + Lori Hatlen1943% games−14.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Leigh Barter
186W–64L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.87
Roger Hatlen
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
Jenna Raynor
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Lori Hatlen
137W–170L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Rosalyn Hatlen
8W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.34
Jeffrey Pollack
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
3.32
3.5
Liz Arcos
193W–124L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Fernando Garcia Banuelos
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Nathan Pool
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Dylan Miller
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.