Teams

CVTA RED

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-18vs RCC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesBen Bernstein / Thomas Booth vs John Stegner / Werner Taljaard2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMatthias van de Liefvoort vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDave Hwang / Lance Olson vs Michael Oakes / Philip Wang1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Yelvington / Robert Harberg vs Zeke Kirkpatrick / Cyrus Mirshab2-6, 1-6
2023-07-11vs LTA-Q BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesThomas Booth / Lance Olson vs Daniel Ohlsen / Erik Esborg3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLuke Trautwein vs Michael Matheson6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSean Kracklauer / Michael Yelvington vs Marc Levinson / Ari Finkelstein2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMatthias van de Liefvoort / Dave Hwang vs Jeff Rodanski / Stewart Wedge5-7, 2-6
2023-07-04vs TTA-E GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesBen Bernstein / Thomas Booth vs Greg Tilden / Lars Malmstrom3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLuke Trautwein vs Mark Walter3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMatthias van de Liefvoort / Lance Olson vs Andrew Eastridge / Thorsten Ohrstrom Sandgren2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSean Kracklauer / Robert Harberg vs Rich Marks / Frederick Longobricco4-6, 4-6
2023-06-27vs MEA BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesTodd Neely / Thomas Booth vs Randolph Dunbar / Dirk Walker3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesLuke Trautwein vs Chris Gray6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLance Olson / Michael Yelvington vs Christopher Barreca / Michael Hirsch6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-20vs NJ BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesTodd Neely / Thomas Booth vs Kenneth Earl / David Schaff3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesLuke Trautwein vs Matt Leoni6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLance Olson / Michael Yelvington vs Dominic Perea / Carl Roberts3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRobert Harberg / Sean Kracklauer vs Darrin Haymond / Rick Brown5-7, 2-6
2023-06-13vs BRMST REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLance Olson / Todd Neely vs Russell Hogan / Kenneth Swanwick3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMatthias van de Liefvoort vs Brad Thurman2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Yelvington / Robert Harberg vs Paul Fazzini / Dan Golden6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDave Hwang / Daniel Flynn vs Perry May / Andrew Sinsel6-2, 6-2
2023-06-06vs BRMST NAVYWon 40
W#1 DoublesThomas Booth / Lance Olson vs David Ipsen / Steve Horace7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMatthias van de Liefvoort vs Mike Dery6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Yelvington / Sean Kracklauer vs Herb Covey / Rich Beaver6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDave Hwang / Todd Neely vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Luke Trautwein
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Matthias van de Liefvoort
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Dave Hwang
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Thomas Booth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Lance Olson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.04
Robert Harberg
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.83
Sean Kracklauer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Ben Bernstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Yelvington
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Todd Neely
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lance Olson + Thomas Booth2449% games+9.2% vs expected
Dave Hwang + Matthias van de Liefvoort9753% games+1.1% vs expected
Lance Olson + Sean Kracklauer1543% games−4.0% vs expected
Michael Yelvington + Robert Harberg0728% games−10.4% vs expected
Michael Yelvington + Lance Olson0638% gamesnot enough data
Luke Trautwein + Thomas Booth314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Yelvington + Sean Kracklauer134 matchesnot enough data
Luke Trautwein + Lance Olson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luke Trautwein
46W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Matthias van de Liefvoort
29W–29L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Dave Hwang
30W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.31
Thomas Booth
33W–65L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Lance Olson
23W–53L career · 7 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Robert Harberg
19W–50L career · 4 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Sean Kracklauer
27W–75L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
Ben Bernstein
9W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Yelvington
1W–24L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Todd Neely
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.