Teams

Chester

2026 18&over Women Day Winter · 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-02-26vs NJD: CrestmontSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJillane Bastarrika / Katrin Redburn vs Marni Garcia / Amanda Milleisen5-7, 5-6
W#1 SinglesMariel Lajterman vs Kendra Bohler6-4, 2-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna BELLE / Jaimie Tomko vs Megan Hall / Meredith Marlin6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRuth Epling / Caroline McCarus vs Teanna Tycher / Stacie Levy2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Donna BELLE
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Consuela Gonzalez
published 3.5
3.16
Jillane Bastarrika
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Caroline McCarus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Francine Meehan
published
Jaimie Tomko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Katrin Redburn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lia Seto
published
Margaret Ferriero
published
Mariel Lajterman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Nicole Howard
published
Ohishi Ishiyama
published
Rachel Reed
published
Ruth Epling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Reed + Jillane Bastarrika5346% games−0.0% vs expected
Rachel Reed + Jaimie Tomko033 matchesnot enough data
Lia Seto + Katrin Redburn123 matchesnot enough data
Consuela Gonzalez + Katrin Redburn303 matchesnot enough data
Jillane Bastarrika + Jaimie Tomko123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Donna BELLE
22W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Consuela Gonzalez
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jillane Bastarrika
36W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
3
Caroline McCarus
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Francine Meehan
12W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jaimie Tomko
4W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Katrin Redburn
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lia Seto
38W–53L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Margaret Ferriero
6W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mariel Lajterman
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nicole Howard
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nina Zalenski Canzoniero
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ohishi Ishiyama
37W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rachel Reed
30W–30L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ruth Epling
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.