Teams

LJHI-Higgins/NMP

2025 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · 7.5 Women 40s

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-20vs LJFI-FINKE/NMP 4.0 40Won 30
W#1 DoublesLauren Woodward / Lindsay Payne vs Jill Sullivan-Keating / Nathalie Naslund6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlison Deaton / Ellyn Pavelka vs Whitney Brunk / Heidi Nyquist6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMorgan Hoecherl / Kelley Montroy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-13vs LJRO-Rodewald/SkybrookWon 30
W#1 DoublesLauren Woodward / Kelley Montroy vs Jane Rodewald / Leta Wiley6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJennifer Higgins / Cindy Japec vs Patricia Baldelli / Patty Smith6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLindsay Payne / Ellyn Pavelka vs Julie Bosley / Amy Barnett7-6, 6-0
2025-10-06vs LEKR-Krogstie/Westport 7.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLauren Woodward / Sherry Lerme vs Christy Bolick / Susie Adams6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Hallman / Cindy Japec vs Becky Heflin / Bridgett Dedmond5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Higgins / Serena Igharas vs Leila Riccardelli / Diane Davis5-7, 2-6
2025-09-22vs LNKA-Kayton/CSD SPARTANWon 30
W#1 DoublesLauren Woodward / Serena Igharas vs Ann Modlin / Astrid Peterson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMorgan Hoecherl / Lindsay Payne vs Mali Robinson / Maggie Strevell6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEllyn Pavelka / Sherry Lerme vs Nicole Kayton / Michelle Potuzak6-4, 7-6
2025-09-15vs LJFI-FINKE/NMP 4.0 40Won 21
W#1 DoublesMorgan Hoecherl / Serena Igharas vs Lauren Hession / LuAnne Pate7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Higgins / Cindy Japec vs Julie Finke / Megan Hartley6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKaren Hallman / Kelley Montroy vs Jennifer Nogowski / Michelle Skaggs5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-09-08vs LJRO-Rodewald/SkybrookWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Woodward / Serena Igharas vs Jane Rodewald / Suzette Watson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCindy Japec / Karen Hallman vs Amy Barnett / Martha Wells6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Higgins / Alison Deaton vs Patricia Baldelli / Patty Smith3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-09-01vs LEKR-Krogstie/Westport 7.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Woodward / Sherry Lerme vs Jennie Carruth / Rebecca Karner2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Hallman / Cindy Japec vs Elizabeth Krogstie / Bridgett Dedmond1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMorgan Hoecherl / Alison Deaton vs Christy Bolick / Crystal Regan2-6, 3-6
2025-08-18vs LNKA-Kayton/CSD SPARTANWon 30
W#1 DoublesLindsay Payne / Karen Hallman vs Suzanne Davis / Kathy Buaron2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Higgins / Cindy Japec vs Mali Robinson / Astrid Peterson6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSherry Lerme / Ellyn Pavelka vs Beth Packard / Heather MacFadyen6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 40s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Lauren Woodward
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Karen Hallman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.71
Ellyn Pavelka
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.65
Jennifer Higgins
published
3.56
Morgan Hoecherl
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.46
Cindy Japec
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Kelley Montroy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Serena Igharas
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Sherry Lerme
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Lindsay Payne
published
3.16
Alison Deaton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Higgins + Lauren Woodward7166% games+8.3% vs expected
Karen Hallman + Cindy Japec6250% games+0.9% vs expected
Serena Igharas + Morgan Hoecherl3251% gamesnot enough data
Karen Hallman + Jennifer Higgins314 matchesnot enough data
Karen Hallman + Lauren Woodward303 matchesnot enough data
Serena Igharas + Lauren Woodward213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lauren Woodward
139W–67L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Karen Hallman
106W–82L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Ellyn Pavelka
78W–66L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.71
Jennifer Higgins
28W–23L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.65
4
Morgan Hoecherl
39W–68L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Cindy Japec
242W–219L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Kelley Montroy
138W–99L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Serena Igharas
149W–124L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Sherry Lerme
90W–106L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
Lindsay Payne
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Alison Deaton
22W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.