Teams

Ialeggio

2024 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-19vs Marcotte - Fall Maryland MadnessWon 10
W#1 DoublesMari Collins / Kim Atkinson vs Diana Shevlin / Audrey Zeidan6-0, 6-2
2024-12-17vs Smith-Poaching PairsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaryn Ialeggio / Karen Leder vs Meaghan Curry / Lucy Yun Yuan6-2, 6-3
2024-12-10vs Donellan-Manor 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Leder / Karyn Ialeggio vs Melisssa Hacopian / Laura MECHAK6-2, 6-1
2024-12-06vs Henry - Norbeck Blue BellesWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Leder / Mari Collins vs Christine Nowack / Amy Weichel1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-11-21vs Korolkoff - Chicks With SticksWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaryn Ialeggio / Mari Collins vs Jayne Korolkoff / Joanne Rome6-3, 6-1
2024-11-12vs Ferramosca - Arlington CrushesLost 02
L#1 DoublesMari Collins / Debbie Rappaport vs Tori Gregorios / Elizabeth Tramonte2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaryn Ialeggio / Elizabeth Angel vs Kerri Thomas / Shannon Haynes4-6, 2-6
2024-11-07vs Franklin - BCC 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaryn Ialeggio / Kim Atkinson vs Christina Pohoryles / Jennifer Winston6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Mari Collins
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Kim Atkinson
published
3.46
Karyn Ialeggio
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.40
Karen Leder
published
3.24
Archer Dudley
published 3.5
2.95
Paula Pels
published
2.84
Kimberly Goldsteen
published
Elizabeth Angel
published
Elizabeth Brody
published
Sandy Schefkind
published
Stacey Kohl
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mari Collins
75W–45L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.85
Kim Atkinson
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Karyn Ialeggio
45W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
Karen Leder
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Archer Dudley
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
Paula Pels
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.95
Kimberly Goldsteen
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.84
Elizabeth Angel
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Elizabeth Brody
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandy Schefkind
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stacey Kohl
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.