← Teams

THPRD-Bailey/Funkhouser

2019 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Clay Funkhouser
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Colin Looi
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3
3.06
Susie Garland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Kerry Sanford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Michael Rich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Jim Mounts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Abbas Mottaghi
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 0
—
Jerry Garland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
—
Steve Sanford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 0
Results8 ties
2019-06-07Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesPaul Stutzman / Susie Garland vs Mike Mullen / Jacqui Slominski6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAbbas Mottaghi / Ellen Mulherin vs Mike Baker / Rhonda Baker6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJerry Garland / Jan Funkhouser vs Tom Bruggere / Melba Davidson7-6, 6-4
2019-06-02Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesSandra Ellis / Colin Looi vs Christine Keefer / Mike Mullen6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJan Kirkpatrick / Jim Mounts vs Rhonda Baker / Chris Keefer7-6, 6-1
2019-05-18Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesAnne Lang / Abbas Mottaghi vs Kathleen Budnick / Paul Best4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKerry Sanford / Steve Sanford vs Michael Lavios / Frederique Lavios4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEllen Mulherin / Michael Rich vs Julia Rea / Douglas Brewer4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2019-05-05Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesSteve Sanford / Kathy Briscoe vs Janice Ackley / Allen VanLeuven4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesColin Looi / Sandra Ellis vs Donna Klindt / Phillip Klindt6-2, 6-0
2019-04-27Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKerry Sanford / Steve Sanford vs Barbara Pasmore / Jon Peters6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnne Lang / Abbas Mottaghi vs Jana Hirst / Jon Mandeville6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKathy Briscoe / Jim Mounts vs Cecilia Nguyen / Hal Bond6-1, 6-2
2019-04-20Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesSandra Ellis / Colin Looi vs Nenette Olson / Mike Olson6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesClay Funkhouser / Susie Garland vs Vincent Scopacasa / Tomoko Langworthy6-2, 6-4
2019-04-13Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesSusie Garland / Clay Funkhouser vs Janet Cathcart / Jeff Anhaltzer6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnne Lang / Michael Rich vs Barb Lipscomb / Gerald Chase6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJan Kirkpatrick / Jerry Garland vs Jayne Mitchell / Reid Larson7-6, 6-0
2019-04-06Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesClay Funkhouser / Kerry Sanford vs Rita DeWeese / Jim DeWeese6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAbbas Mottaghi / Bonnie Bailey vs Zachary Wright / Kim Wright6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Clay Funkhouser
37W–53L career
not enough data
—
3
Colin Looi
91W–53L career
0%56%44%
3.08
3.5
Susie Garland
37W–56L career
25%75%0%
3.06
3.5
Kerry Sanford
22W–32L career · type A
40%60%0%
3.00
3
Michael Rich
45W–77L career
0%95%5%
2.90
3
Jim Mounts
59W–65L career
0%96%4%
2.87
0
Abbas Mottaghi
8W–14L career
not enough data
—
0
Jerry Garland
5W–18L career
not enough data
—
0
Steve Sanford
31W–35L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.