Teams

Sports Mall-Adams

2026 Winter League-Weekday · 4.0W AM

22 players · average NTRP 3.90 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-12vs Sports Mall-BrownLost 04
L#1 DoublesAmanda Lewis / Amber Thompson vs Breanne Taylor / Martha Brown2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Koelliker / Katie Zimmerman vs Mithona Nielsen / Heather Evans6-7, 1-3
L#3 DoublesJan Chamberlain / Elizabeth Michie vs Christy Owens / Allison Roberts4-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesAnnalyn Adams / Kristel Affleck vs Trisha Cutrer / Crystel Fox0-6, 1-6
2026-03-05vs Wasatch Hills-Swensen/SampsonSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAnnalyn Adams / Alyson Ellis vs Jennifer Sampson / Katie Swensen6-2, 6-5
L#2 DoublesRobyn Scharman / Julie Labrum vs Mindy Dunyon / Deanne Goaslind1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNatalie Watts / Gwen Boyault vs Alena Taylor / Gretel Sampson6-1, 6-4
L#4 DoublesTeisa Linscott / Kristel Affleck vs Alisa Gardner / Emily Benton2-6, 1-6
2026-02-26vs Sports Mall-GreenLost 13
L#1 DoublesPamela Roberts / Robyn Scharman vs Lexi Farr / Mae Alexander2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Michie / Natalie Watts vs Ann Weaver / Sara Green2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesWilhelmina Hoggan / Lindie Hoggan vs Alexa Saltzman / Robin Simmons3-6, 5-4, 0-1
W#4 DoublesKristel Affleck / Annalyn Adams vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-19vs Eagleridge-MowerWon 31
W#1 DoublesRobyn Scharman / Pamela Roberts vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlyson Ellis / Amanda Lewis vs Becky Thompson / Jennifer Jensen6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnnalyn Adams / Teisa Linscott vs Meghan Maughan / Shelley Petersen6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#4 DoublesLindie Hoggan / Wilhelmina Hoggan vs Lisa Beames / Kacee Preston6-4, 5-3
2026-02-12vs LP-NelsonWon 40
W#1 DoublesPamela Roberts / Amber Thompson vs Melissa Despain / Jennifer Moreton7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGwen Boyault / Kelly Wilcox vs Rachel Mills / Kimberly Holmstrom6-2, 6-5
W#3 DoublesJan Chamberlain / Elizabeth Michie vs Jacki Joseph / Cricket Rollins6-1, 7-6
W#4 DoublesRobyn Scharman / Natalie Watts vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-05vs Eagleridge-GlinesLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmber Thompson / Kelly Wilcox vs Heidi Brophy / Jaime Vance4-6, 3-4
L#2 DoublesKatie Zimmerman / Gwen Boyault vs Emily Hales / Rachel Mcillece4-6, 6-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristel Affleck / Elizabeth Thomas vs Debby Richards / Michele Halls6-1, 3-5, 0-1
2026-01-29vs Eccles-LoveWon 21
W#2 DoublesRobyn Scharman / Alyson Ellis vs Jennifer Rasmussen / Kim Cronin6-2, 5-3
L#3 DoublesSusan Koelliker / Natalie Watts vs Elma Tatarevic / Chandi Hurd7-5, 2-5, 0-1
W#4 DoublesJan Chamberlain / Elizabeth Michie vs Michelle Maxfield / DeeAnn Henderson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-01-22vs Sports Mall-BrownLost 13
L#1 DoublesWilhelmina Hoggan / Lindie Hoggan vs Christy Owens / Kat Fuller3-6, 2-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Koelliker / Katie Zimmerman vs Megan Bewsey / Courtney Bedke6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAmanda Lewis / Jan Chamberlain vs Martha Brown / Breanne Taylor2-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesAnnalyn Adams / Teisa Linscott vs Mithona Nielsen / Tiffany Zarbock5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Gwen Boyault
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.93
Alyson Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Teisa Linscott
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Susan Koelliker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Robyn Scharman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Anji DowDell
published 4
3.74
Elizabeth Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Amber Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Jan Chamberlain
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Joanna Heiden
published 4
3.59
Annalyn Adams
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.55
Wilhelmina Hoggan
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Pamela Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Kelly Wilcox
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Natalie Watts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Amanda Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.39
Lindie Hoggan
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Julie Labrum
usually #4 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Elizabeth Michie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Tiffany Renfro
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Kristel Affleck
usually #4 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Katie Zimmerman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Labrum + Robyn Scharman7358% games+8.5% vs expected
Tiffany Renfro + Alyson Ellis10458% games+7.5% vs expected
Amanda Lewis + Kristel Affleck7652% games+5.5% vs expected
Kristel Affleck + Elizabeth Thomas5854% games+5.4% vs expected
Alyson Ellis + Pamela Roberts5062% games+5.3% vs expected
Natalie Watts + Amanda Lewis3450% games+4.6% vs expected
Julie Labrum + Kelly Wilcox4453% games+4.4% vs expected
Lindie Hoggan + Anji DowDell5356% games+4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gwen Boyault
33W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Alyson Ellis
173W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Teisa Linscott
170W–105L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Susan Koelliker
133W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Robyn Scharman
118W–67L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Anji DowDell
95W–74L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Elizabeth Thomas
31W–46L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Amber Thompson
131W–110L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Jan Chamberlain
50W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Joanna Heiden
93W–99L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Annalyn Adams
122W–97L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.59
Wilhelmina Hoggan
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Pamela Roberts
97W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
Kelly Wilcox
140W–69L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Natalie Watts
41W–58L career · 3 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
3.40
4
Amanda Lewis
49W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
3.40
Lindie Hoggan
58W–74L career · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.39
Julie Labrum
98W–95L career · 8 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Elizabeth Michie
92W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Tiffany Renfro
119W–133L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Kristel Affleck
123W–116L career · 8 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
Katie Zimmerman
21W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.