Teams

CED:Cedardale:Cleghorn

2021 EMA Adult 55 & Over Men · 7.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-28vs BRTC:Bass River:MoffieSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDean Cleghorn / George Plourde vs Anthony Nickas / David Ray1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMatt Ehrie / Mike McWeeney vs Jerry Cellucci / Ian Boehm7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-26vs SFT:Spark:UluatamWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Round / Douglas Swatski vs Mark Yanowitz / Jeffrey Stone6-0, 6-3
2021-06-25vs SFT:Spark:UluatamLost 01
L#1 DoublesMatt Ehrie / Scott Round vs Mark Yanowitz / Al Uluatam6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2021-06-21vs BRTC:Bass River:MoffieWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeorge Plourde / Dean Cleghorn vs Gary Moffie / John Carollo7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAlan MacLaren / Douglas Swatski vs David Ray / Anthony Nickas2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMatt Ehrie / Mike McWeeney vs Gifford Campbell / Stephen Gleason6-7, 4-3, 1-0
2021-05-10vs BRTC:Bass River:MoffieLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Spring / Dean Cleghorn vs Anthony Nickas / Jack Hughes1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGeorge Plourde / George Desrochers vs Stephen Gleason / Jerry Cellucci5-7, 2-6
2021-05-03vs SFT:Spark:UluatamLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlan MacLaren / Scott Round vs Daniele Baliani / David Repetto2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGeorge Desrochers / David Spring vs Erik C Smith / Juan Ortega3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMatt Ehrie / George Plourde vs Carmen Scarpa / Jeffrey Stone3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Douglas Swatski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Matt Ehrie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Alan MacLaren
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
David Spring
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Dean Cleghorn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
George Desrochers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
George Plourde
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mike McWeeney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Scott Round
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Douglas Swatski
31W–52L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
Matt Ehrie
49W–57L career · 4 lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
2.97
Alan MacLaren
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
David Spring
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Dean Cleghorn
19W–41L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
George Desrochers
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
George Plourde
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mike McWeeney
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Scott Round
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.