Teams

HR:Harvard:Chan/Diamond

2026 EMA Adult 18 & Over Men · 5.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.75 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-16vs BRTC:Bass River:UttardSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJames Gayvert / Charles Yung vs Jason Sechrist / Jaye Horvath3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAlexander Buzzi vs Brady Ryan6-4, 6-2
2026-07-13vs LFNT:Boston Burners:Imrie/AulsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesSamuel Charney / Ben Heinrich vs Connor Aulson / Andrew Imrie5-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesJesse Frieder vs Kartik Erodula6-2, 4-3
L#2 DoublesCharles Yung / BHARAT RAJU DANDU vs Edward Shepherd Johnson / Weston Brach6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2026-07-12vs SFT:Spark-A:GrimesLost 03
L#1 DoublesZachary Brint / Samuel Charney vs Mckinley Grimes / Christian Duffy5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJames Gayvert vs Maximilian Bonte3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesFabian Suri-Payer / Charles Yung vs Chase Savage / Reilly O'Brien3-6, 0-6
2026-07-06vs LFNT:Boston Burners:Imrie/AulsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSamuel Charney / Ben Heinrich vs Weston Brach / Andrew Imrie2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAlastair Chapman vs Edward Shepherd Johnson3-6, 2-6
2026-06-15vs WOB:Bay State Aces:AsaadLost 02
L#1 DoublesJesse Frieder / Alexander Buzzi vs Erik Ratta / Phoenix Tamaoki2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFabian Suri-Payer / Samuel Charney vs Ian Tracy / Nkrumah Patrick4-6, 1-6
2026-06-08vs BRTC:Bass River:UttardWon 21
L#1 DoublesAaron Diamond / Charles Yung vs Ryan Adamonis / Jaye Horvath0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAlexander Buzzi vs Timothy Fayed6-1, 6-5
W#2 DoublesSamuel Charney / Ben Heinrich vs Alexandre Uttard / Alejandro P Andres2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-18vs SFT:Spark-A:GrimesLost 03
L#1 DoublesCharles Yung / Aaron Diamond vs Mckinley Grimes / Tristan Thiebaut3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesFabian Suri-Payer vs Chase Savage2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBen Heinrich / BHARAT RAJU DANDU vs Mark Billone / Reilly O'Brien4-6, 3-6
2026-05-11vs WOB:Bay State Aces:AsaadLost 12
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Chan / Charles Yung vs Albert Codina Sala / Ian Tracy2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAlexander Buzzi vs Phoenix Tamaoki6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Beluch / BHARAT RAJU DANDU vs Daniel Rodefeld / YOUSEF ASAAD6-3, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 5.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SFT:Spark-A:Grimes0819514192
2WOB:Bay State Aces:Asaad08141022213
3LFNT:Boston Burners:Imrie/Aulson08141026230
4BRTC:Bass River:Uttard0871734216
5HR:Harvard:Chan/Diamond0861838255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.46 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.86
Alexander Buzzi
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
Aaron Diamond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Alastair Chapman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.54
Charles Yung
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.51
Samuel Charney
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.50
Ben Heinrich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 4.5
4.31
BHARAT RAJU DANDU
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
Benjamin Chan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Fabian Suri-Payer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
James Gayvert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Jesse Frieder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Michael Beluch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Spencer Piston
published
William Ryan
published
Zachary Brint
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samuel Charney + Ben Heinrich314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alexander Buzzi
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.86
5
Aaron Diamond
15W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
5
Alastair Chapman
13W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Charles Yung
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.54
Samuel Charney
13W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.51
4.5
Ben Heinrich
17W–4L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.50
4.5
BHARAT RAJU DANDU
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
4.31
4.5
Benjamin Chan
56W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
4.29
Fabian Suri-Payer
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.21
James Gayvert
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jesse Frieder
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Beluch
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Spencer Piston
20W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
William Ryan
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Zachary Brint
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.