Teams

Gustin/Knoxville

2026 Tri-Level 55 & Over-Knoxville · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-15vs Smead/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Seamons / Jennifer Lea vs Wendi Arnold / Jennifer Collins3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Crider / Grace Novinger vs Janis Crye / Joy Benson1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLeigh Gatto / Melissa Theyken vs Paula Cutter / Martha Filipkowski3-6, 1-6
2026-02-06vs Williams/KnoxvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Hollingsworth / Tracey Belmont vs Sandra Walker / Laila Guindi6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLeigh Gatto / Angela Gustin vs Rhonda Mann / Jan Berry6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-01-23vs Smead/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Nelson / Carol Seamons vs Jennifer Collins / Patsy Fischer6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShannon Thackston / Elizabeth Justus vs Debbie Bryant / Janis Crye6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLeigh Gatto / Cindy Holt vs Paula Cutter / Renee Trent0-6, 2-6
2026-01-18vs Williams/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesAngela Gustin / Melissa Theyken vs Rhonda Mann / Jodi St Charles0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJamie Collins / Margaret Goldman vs Mary Vineyard / Diane Williams6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTracey Belmont / Kelly Hollingsworth vs Mary Kathryn Cockrill / Sandra Walker6-3, 6-1
2026-01-10vs Smead/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesTracey Belmont / Kimberly Nelson vs Angie Goodwyn / Jennifer Collins4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Goldman / Mary Crider vs Debbie Bryant / Joy Benson6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCindy Holt / Angela Gustin vs Cheri Arnsdorff / Martha Filipkowski2-6, 0-6
2026-01-09vs Williams/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Hollingsworth / Jennifer Lea vs Mary Kathryn Cockrill / Laila Guindi6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Justus / Shannon Thackston vs Gail Rieger / Marcia Bates6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMelissa Theyken / Cindy Holt vs Jodi St Charles / Rhonda Mann2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Smead/Knoxville6015311132
2Gustin/Knoxville2461225163

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Carol Seamons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Kelly Hollingsworth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Jennifer Lea
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Tracey Belmont
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Margaret Goldman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Elizabeth Justus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Shannon Thackston
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.62
Mary Crider
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Angela Gustin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.11
Melissa Theyken
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.96
Cindy Holt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.87
Leigh Gatto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Holt + Leigh Gatto0623% gamesnot enough data
Shannon Thackston + Elizabeth Justus5077% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Seamons
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
3.44
Kelly Hollingsworth
18W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Jennifer Lea
11W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Tracey Belmont
15W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Margaret Goldman
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Elizabeth Justus
23W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
Shannon Thackston
24W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Mary Crider
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
2.62
2.5
Angela Gustin
3W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
Melissa Theyken
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Cindy Holt
3W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Leigh Gatto
3W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.