Teams

Grandma's Gone Wild 2.0

2026 65 & Over League · Women 7.0 - 65 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MONTANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-14vs Miller TimeLost 12
L#1 DoublesMargaret Moffatt / Joanne Brekjern vs Anne Caprio / Ritva Porter4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRoberta Knorr / Donna Evans vs Nora Miller / Cheryl Scott2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLori Abbott / Kathleen Bean vs DIANA RAIMONDO / Cyndy Desin6-3, 7-6
2026-06-13vs Miller TimeWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoanne Brekjern / Lori Abbott vs Anne Caprio / Ritva Porter2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Bean / Terri Ruthruff vs Arianna Whitman / DIANA RAIMONDO1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRoberta Knorr / Donna Evans vs Susan Olson / Cyndy Desin6-1, 6-4
2026-06-13vs Miller TimeWon 21
W#1 DoublesTerri Ruthruff / Margaret Moffatt vs Marie Neergaard / Anne Caprio6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDonna Evans / Roberta Knorr vs Karen Vinton / Arianna Whitman6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathleen Bean / Lori Abbott vs Cheryl Scott / Nora Miller3-6, 5-7
2026-06-12vs Miller TimeWon 30
W#1 DoublesLori Abbott / Terri Ruthruff vs Nora Miller / Marie Neergaard6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Bean / Margaret Moffatt vs Karen Vinton / Ritva Porter6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Evans / Roberta Knorr vs Susan Olson / Cyndy Desin6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Women 7.0 - 65 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Grandma's Gone Wild 2.0318411103

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Margaret Moffatt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Terri Ruthruff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.93
Lori Abbott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Donna Evans
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Joanne Brekjern
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Bean
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roberta Knorr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Evans + Roberta Knorr252252% games−6.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Margaret Moffatt
17W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Terri Ruthruff
94W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3
Lori Abbott
12W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Donna Evans
29W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Joanne Brekjern
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathleen Bean
21W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Roberta Knorr
28W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.