Teams

Lahaina Lobsters

2023 Adult 18 and Over League · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-09vs Mike's 3.5W #2Won 41
W#1 DoublesTania Kellermeyer / Ann Marugaki vs Darleen Ornellas / Donna Revells6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRebecca Bowie vs Sue Linder6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Cross / Kim Houlne vs Janie King / Linda Coleon0-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesCeleste Abate vs Jane Sakakihara6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRenee Scherrer / Frankie Sharpe vs Tricia Kezeli / Virginia Suddath6-2, 6-3
2023-07-01vs Mike's 3.5W #1Split 22
L#1 DoublesCeleste Abate / Barbara Skaggs vs Karla Nutt / Gaela Prince3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesKim Houlne vs Carol Lam7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSusan Bailey / Renee Scherrer vs Daphne Okamoto / Susan Sato1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTania Kellermeyer / Ann Marugaki vs Christina Haywood / Cynthia Sawyer6-4, 7-5
2023-06-25vs OuterlimitsLost 05
L#1 DoublesGrace Day / Dianna Garnes vs Sonia Kreag / Lore Lee Robello0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKim Houlne vs Crystal Graves2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Bailey / Rebecca Bowie vs Pamela Henry / Amanda Tillson2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCeleste Abate vs Stacie Thorlakson3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTania Kellermeyer / Renee Scherrer vs Clarita Balala / M Beverly Rivers1-6, 1-6
2023-06-17vs Mike's 3.5W #2Won 32
L#1 DoublesLisa Winston / Barbara Skaggs vs Darleen Ornellas / Donna Revells5-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesSuLan Peebles vs Sue Linder6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesFrankie Sharpe / Grace Day vs Linda Coleon / Debra Lordan6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesRebecca Bowie vs Rosemary Bachaus6-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Bailey / Dianna Garnes vs Janie King / Virginia Suddath4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-06-11vs Mike's 3.5W #1Won 31
W#1 DoublesBarbara Skaggs / Nancy Cross vs Jan Bryan / Gina Teliho7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSuLan Peebles vs Karla Nutt6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRenee Scherrer / Frankie Sharpe vs Gaela Prince / Cammy Clark3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Winston / Rebecca Bowie vs Ashley Koyanagi / Donna Barker6-0, 6-4
2023-06-10vs OuterlimitsLost 23
W#1 DoublesMonica Bice / Barbara Skaggs vs Michelle DeFilippi / M Beverly Rivers7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCeleste Abate vs Crystal Graves1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Cross / Ann Marugaki vs Yuki Carrozzino / Tesha Newman1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesSuLan Peebles vs Eveline Wunder6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDianna Garnes / Lisa Winston vs Amanda Tillson / Kristin Walker2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
SuLan Peebles
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.24
Rebecca Bowie
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.20
Ann Marugaki
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Celeste Abate
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Dianna Garnes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Barbara Skaggs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Tania Kellermeyer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Lisa Winston
published
2.94
Grace Day
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Kim Houlne
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Monica Bice
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Cross
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Renee Scherrer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tania Kellermeyer + Ann Marugaki4155% games+8.1% vs expected
Nancy Cross + Ann Marugaki3255% games+3.0% vs expected
Barbara Skaggs + Ann Marugaki121252% games+2.8% vs expected
Nancy Cross + Barbara Skaggs17853% games+1.5% vs expected
Barbara Skaggs + Monica Bice6454% games−0.7% vs expected
Barbara Skaggs + Tania Kellermeyer3350% games−4.6% vs expected
Tania Kellermeyer + Renee Scherrer044 matchesnot enough data
Tania Kellermeyer + Celeste Abate224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

SuLan Peebles
292W–221L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.32
Rebecca Bowie
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Ann Marugaki
75W–74L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Celeste Abate
24W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Dianna Garnes
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Barbara Skaggs
49W–41L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Tania Kellermeyer
42W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Lisa Winston
73W–125L career · no lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
3.08
Grace Day
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%65%34%
2.94
Kim Houlne
25W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
Monica Bice
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Cross
25W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Renee Scherrer
4W–15L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Bailey
23W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.