Teams

Yragui/Brackett 3.0 40+ Fall25

2026 USTA League Adult 40 & Over - Fall 2025- HSV · 3.0 WOMEN 40N1S3D

18 players · average NTRP 2.91 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-13vs Rustic 40+ 3.0Split 22
L#1 DoublesBushra Younus / Jenny Shaneyfelt vs Barbara Doty / Melissa Bryant6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJacqui Bianca vs Sheri Rustic1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTina Yragui / Eishin Sakata vs Kim Delchamps / Ellie Sternberg Lastinger7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnita Beatty / Beverly Allen vs Lynne Woodson / Mary Margaret Whiting Hays6-3, 6-3
2025-11-01vs Loomis/Kelly 40+3.0Lost 04
L#1 DoublesSusan Jambor / Allison Gregg vs Kimberley Loomis / Michelle Roth4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDianne Higginbotham vs Michelle Salehi1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnita Beatty / Sabrina Hammond vs Melissa Haynes / Cathy Myrick0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichele Thomas / Anita Dulaney vs Kimberly Matson / Julie Satterfeal2-6, 4-6
2025-10-28vs Davis/Boothe Fall25Lost 13
L#1 DoublesCathy Vanvalkenburgh / Susan Jambor vs Sylvia Jarvis / Tracy Bond2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAllison Gregg vs Betty Vinson6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAndrea Cantrell / Jacqui Bianca vs Velvet Hopkins / Susan Zinkil3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichele Thomas / Jenny Shaneyfelt vs Mary Watson / Kimberly Ejide2-6, 6-7
2025-10-18vs Rustic 40+ 3.0Lost 04
L#1 DoublesAnita Dulaney / Bushra Younus vs Vanessa Moorman / Ellie Sternberg Lastinger3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDianne Higginbotham vs Sheri Rustic3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Darwin / Sabrina Hammond vs Robin DiFranco / Rebecca Cappetta1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTina Yragui / Jacqui Bianca vs Kim Delchamps / Lea Anne Schultz5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-10-13vs Davis/Boothe Fall25Won 31
L#1 DoublesAllison Gregg / Cathy Vanvalkenburgh vs Susan Zinkil / Beth Berry2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Garrison vs Tracy Bond7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBushra Younus / Beverly Allen vs Laura Boothe / Trina Weir6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJenny Shaneyfelt / Sabrina Hammond vs Lynnae Hall / Mary Watson6-2, 6-4
2025-10-11vs Loomis/Kelly 40+3.0Lost 04
L#1 DoublesCathy Vanvalkenburgh / Allison Gregg vs Michelle Roth / Kimberley Loomis3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAnita Dulaney vs Brittnee Robinson1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Cantrell / Susan Jambor vs Cathy Myrick / Susi Mann6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Garrison / Tina Yragui vs Christina Caprio-smith / Melissa Haynes4-6, 4-6
2025-10-09vs Rustic 40+ 3.0Lost 13
W#1 DoublesLori White / Anita Dulaney vs Melissa Bryant / Rebecca Cappetta6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAllison Gregg vs Robin DiFranco6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBushra Younus / Amy Garrison vs Shannon Lindig / Lynne Woodson6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichele Thomas / Anita Beatty vs Kim Delchamps / Tracy McMahan3-6, 2-6
2025-10-05vs Davis/Boothe Fall25Split 22
W#1 DoublesAmy Garrison / Anita Beatty vs Cindy Davis / Laura Boothe6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAllison Gregg vs Kimberly Ejide2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Darwin / Jacqui Bianca vs Velvet Hopkins / Trina Weir4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAndrea Cantrell / Susan Jambor vs Cheryl Piette / Melissa Kaiser7-5, 6-3
2025-10-01vs Loomis/Kelly 40+3.0Lost 13
L#1 DoublesDianne Higginbotham / Bushra Younus vs Melissa Haynes / Kristin Wilson2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAmy Garrison vs Kimberly Matson1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTina Yragui / Eishin Sakata vs Jennifer Kelly / Stefanie Polk3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichele Thomas / Anita Dulaney vs Christina Caprio-smith / Brittnee Robinson2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 WOMEN 40N1S3D
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Rustic 40+ 3.09029721235
2Loomis/Kelly 40+3.063211533296
3Davis/Boothe Fall2527122450353
4Yragui/Brackett 3.0 40+ Fall2518102658398

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Eishin Sakata
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.09
Maranatha Brackett
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Cathy Vanvalkenburgh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Bushra Younus
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.70
Dianne Higginbotham
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.67
Jenny Shaneyfelt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Allison Gregg
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Michele Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Anita Beatty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Sabrina Hammond
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.59
Anita Dulaney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.53
Beverly Allen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.52
Andrea Cantrell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.43
Susan Jambor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.41
Tina Yragui
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.39
Amy Garrison
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.29
Jacqui Bianca
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Judy Darwin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dianne Higginbotham + Tina Yragui3447% games+11.5% vs expected
Maranatha Brackett + Bushra Younus7068% games+7.7% vs expected
Cathy Vanvalkenburgh + Allison Gregg3450% games+5.2% vs expected
Anita Dulaney + Bushra Younus2839% games−1.7% vs expected
Andrea Cantrell + Amy Garrison1437% games−6.5% vs expected
Michele Thomas + Anita Dulaney1437% games−8.0% vs expected
Susan Jambor + Anita Dulaney0630% games−9.5% vs expected
Michele Thomas + Sabrina Hammond0628% games−10.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Eishin Sakata
59W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
Maranatha Brackett
69W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
Cathy Vanvalkenburgh
38W–41L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Bushra Younus
33W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Dianne Higginbotham
23W–30L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Jenny Shaneyfelt
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Allison Gregg
13W–32L career · 6 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.62
Michele Thomas
9W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Anita Beatty
7W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
Sabrina Hammond
15W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Anita Dulaney
41W–88L career · 8 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Beverly Allen
9W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Andrea Cantrell
7W–30L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
Susan Jambor
2W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.43
Tina Yragui
34W–61L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.41
2.5
Amy Garrison
22W–39L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.39
2.5
Jacqui Bianca
11W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
Judy Darwin
5W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.