GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Pace/CCC

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEPTA

Schedule

Flight standings9 teams · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Rojas/EPTC#3	7	1	17	7	17	154
2GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Marquez/EPTC#2	7	1	17	7	17	169
3GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Correa/EPCC#1	6	2	18	6	15	151
4GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Boney/EPTC#4	6	2	17	7	16	145
5GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Galindo/EPTC#5	3	5	10	14	33	234
6GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/McCarthy/EPTC#1	3	5	9	15	33	228
7GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Rios/TW	2	6	8	16	32	209
8GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Pace/CCC	1	7	6	18	37	244
9GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Hufft/FB	1	7	6	18	38	242

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.16 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.38

Alison Leben

usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 2.5

2.23

April Senclair Duran

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5

1.87

AYLEEN PACE

usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5

—

Lindsey Yancey

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published —

—

Maggie Lindner

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Marisela Scott

usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published —

—

Monica Ramirez

usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published —

—

PAMELA ZARAGOZA

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published —

—

Sandra Olivas

usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marisela Scott + Alison Leben	6–4	57% games	not enough data
Monica Ramirez + Alison Leben	5–4	55% games	not enough data
Monica Ramirez + AYLEEN PACE	2–6	33% games	not enough data
Lindsey Yancey + Maggie Lindner	2–4	44% games	not enough data
Monica Ramirez + Maggie Lindner	2–1	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5

Alison Leben

33W–31L career · 34 lines in 2026

0%83%17%

2.38

2.5

April Senclair Duran

2W–4L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026

0%98%2%

2.23

2.5

AYLEEN PACE

4W–38L career · 18 lines in 2026

0%>99%<1%

1.87

—

Lindsey Yancey

6W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Maggie Lindner

13W–23L career · 9 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Marisela Scott

18W–28L career · 19 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Monica Ramirez

17W–63L career · 27 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

PAMELA ZARAGOZA

3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Sandra Olivas

0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.