Teams

Lott/Palmer

2025 Lubbock Adult League 40 & Over · 4.0 Ladies

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-12vs Boren/ FioroniWon 21
W#1 DoublesGinger Wayland / Amy Gandy vs Amy Boren / Angela Trevithick6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLindsey Craig / Jenni Rogers vs Jennifer Moore / Shaunna Jensen0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda White / Lauren Cranford vs Claudia Bradley / Patty Rogers7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2025-03-03vs Cone/LetbetterWon 21
W#1 DoublesShannon Miller / Amy Gandy vs Paige Dane / Paige Siege6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLisa MacK / Kimberly Lott vs Marlowe Malouf Lawson / Kristen Strefling4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesElvira Cruz / Lynda Pouria vs Oneal Underwood / Elise White6-4, 7-6
2025-02-27vs Cone/LetbetterWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Gandy / Kimberly Lott vs Ashley Harris / Marlowe Malouf Lawson7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLindsey Craig / Jenni Rogers vs Kristen Strefling / Elise White2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLynda Pouria / Maritza Palmer vs Sharla Letbetter / Kim Cone5-7, 0-6
2025-02-26vs Boren/ FioroniLost 12
L#1 DoublesElvira Cruz / Shannon Miller vs Paulette Sturdivant / Jennifer Moore0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Lott / Ginger Wayland vs Amy Boren / Angela Trevithick6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLauren Cranford / Amanda White vs Laurie Oltmans / Shaunna Jensen6-3, 6-3
2025-02-20vs Boren/ FioroniWon 21
W#1 DoublesLindsey Craig / Jenni Rogers vs Jennifer Moore / Patty Rogers6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShannon Miller / Amy Gandy vs Amy Boren / Angela Trevithick6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMaritza Palmer / Lynda Pouria vs Claudia Bradley / Paulette Sturdivant6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-02-06vs Cone/LetbetterWon 21
L#1 DoublesElvira Cruz / Ginger Wayland vs Ashley Harris / Marlowe Malouf Lawson0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLisa MacK / Amy Gandy vs Kim Cone / Oneal Underwood6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLauren Cranford / Amanda White vs Kathryn Orr / Paige Siege6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Lisa MacK
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Maritza Palmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Kimberly Lott
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Amy Gandy
published 4
3.66
Jenni Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Lynda Pouria
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Lindsey Craig
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Ginger Wayland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Shannon Miller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Elvira Cruz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Lauren Cranford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenni Rogers + Lindsey Craig8359% games+11.5% vs expected
Lynda Pouria + Maritza Palmer7259% games−3.2% vs expected
Maritza Palmer + Lisa MacK5160% gamesnot enough data
Jenni Rogers + Elvira Cruz314 matchesnot enough data
Jenni Rogers + Maritza Palmer303 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Lott + Lisa MacK213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa MacK
30W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.88
Maritza Palmer
29W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
Kimberly Lott
41W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Amy Gandy
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenni Rogers
37W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.66
Lynda Pouria
28W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
Lindsey Craig
27W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Ginger Wayland
11W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.60
Shannon Miller
22W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Elvira Cruz
45W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Lauren Cranford
25W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.