Teams

Alachua/Porter/40&over8.0MXD

2024 Alachua Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 4.12 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-22vs DB - BlairLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Cribb / Andrew Messenger vs Christa Arnold / Vincent LoCascio2-6, 3-6
2024-05-08vs DB - BlairLost 01
L#1 DoublesRoss van Boven / Jigisha Shah vs Camilo Fita / Ekanong van Roy7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2024-04-14vs WS - PaulyWon 10
W#1 DoublesRoss van Boven / Stephanie Ryan vs Alejandro Pauly / Jenny Neelands6-3, 6-4
2024-04-07vs DB - BlairSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStephanie Ryan / Ross van Boven vs Donald Blair / Christa Arnold6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTracey Bryant / Andrew Messenger vs Dan Weisman / Cathy Boon6-2, 6-2
2024-03-24vs WS - PaulyLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Ryan / Roy Cribb vs Julie Sager / Rupen Shah4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-02-11vs WS - PaulyWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Hostetler / Mary Cribb vs Jungyun Hwang / Jenny Neelands6-4, 6-0
2024-02-02vs DB - BlairWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Messenger / Mary Cribb vs David Blumberg / Marlene Townsend6-4, 7-5
2024-01-21vs WS - PaulyWon 30
W#1 DoublesRoss van Boven / Stephanie Ryan vs Alejandro Pauly / Jenny Neelands5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMark Hostetler / Mary Cribb vs Josh Spink / Alison Andrus6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTracey Bryant / Roy Cribb vs Boris Kuchuk / Maria Curatolo6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Clark MacCullough
published 4.5
4.43
Ross van Boven
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Tracey Bryant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Andrew Messenger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Mark Hostetler
published
3.72
Roy Cribb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Stephanie Ryan
published
3.08
Jigisha Shah
published
Mary Cribb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Norma Banes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracey Bryant + Roy Cribb4356% games−4.0% vs expected
Roy Cribb + Mary Cribb5255% gamesnot enough data
Mary Cribb + Andrew Messenger134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Clark MacCullough
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
4.49
Ross van Boven
100W–51L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
4.43
4
Tracey Bryant
48W–46L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Andrew Messenger
57W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
Mark Hostetler
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Roy Cribb
46W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.72
Stephanie Ryan
9W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
Jigisha Shah
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
Mary Cribb
34W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Norma Banes
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.