Teams

TOC.Kalluru

2025 CTRL Summer Singles 40 & Over · Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-19vs PW.HaywardSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRajshekar Chandraprakash vs Francois Laflamme3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesEslam Soliman vs Blake Hall6-4, 6-3
2025-08-19vs KF.ZeidlerSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRajshekar Chandraprakash vs Jimmy Lewis4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesAshok Babu Raparla vs Blair Lilly6-2, 6-2
2025-08-12vs TOC.XiaoWon 21
L#1 SinglesEslam Soliman vs Junhua Wu2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesRajshekar Chandraprakash vs Ashutosh Chaudhari6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesRamakrishna Munagala vs Luo Xiao6-3, 6-2
2025-07-22vs TOC.GiriWon 20
W#1 SinglesRajshekar Chandraprakash vs Amit Sachan6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesEslam Soliman vs Vijay Sharma6-3, 6-2
2025-07-16vs TOC.HorowitzWon 10
W#3 SinglesAshok Babu Raparla vs Jamie Huang6-1, 6-3
2025-07-09vs TOC.KumarWon 20
W#1 SinglesEslam Soliman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesRajshekar Chandraprakash vs Ravi Karanam6-0, 6-0
2025-06-24vs TOC.DeivasigamaniLost 01
L#1 SinglesEslam Soliman vs Sameer Cheema1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Rajshekar Chandraprakash
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.52
Eslam Soliman
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.47
Vivek Singh
published
3.40
Seshagiri Kalluru
published
3.38
Ramakrishna Munagala
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Ashok Babu Raparla
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Seshagiri Kalluru + Ramakrishna Munagala8361% games+6.8% vs expected
Rajshekar Chandraprakash + Ashok Babu Raparla161055% games+0.7% vs expected
Eslam Soliman + Rajshekar Chandraprakash6456% games−0.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rajshekar Chandraprakash
76W–48L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Eslam Soliman
75W–67L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Vivek Singh
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Seshagiri Kalluru
26W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.40
3.5
Ramakrishna Munagala
56W–44L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Ashok Babu Raparla
37W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Malla Reddy Anumandla
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.