Teams

Southside - Shuman

2025 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Women Winter · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Winter - Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesPolly Curole / Lezita Davis vs Kelly Doucette / Jane Partridge7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-15vs Eagle Harbor - AiosaLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelli Bushman / Svetlana Mityul vs Debra Sutton / Kellie Philips3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDonna Erenberg / Lisa Rangeo vs Jolene Hamel / Kristen Schermerhorn6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSandy Wedge / Eleanor Mitchell vs Sheri Woods / Deana Jones6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-02-22vs Duval/Latta-Raines/55&Over7.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesShari Shuman / Polly Curole vs Kelly Cusick / Ronda Allen5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Winter - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Polly Curole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Lisa Rangeo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Kelli Bushman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Julie Hoffman
published
3.22
Debbie Brooks
published 3.5
3.20
Svetlana Mityul
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Carman Kasper
published 3.5
3.18
Gidget Bennett
published 3.5
3.16
Shari Shuman
published
3.09
Donna Erenberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.79
Sandy Wedge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Eleanor Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Karen White
published
Lezita Davis
published
Susan Sceifers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelli Bushman + Julie Hoffman4946% games−5.6% vs expected
Svetlana Mityul + Debbie Brooks224 matchesnot enough data
Donna Erenberg + Susan Sceifers404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Polly Curole
112W–66L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Lisa Rangeo
19W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Kelli Bushman
23W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
Julie Hoffman
9W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Debbie Brooks
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Svetlana Mityul
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Carman Kasper
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Gidget Bennett
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Shari Shuman
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Donna Erenberg
10W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Sandy Wedge
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Eleanor Mitchell
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Karen White
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lezita Davis
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Sceifers
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.