Teams

KY/LOU/RICE/CHANEY (40's)

COMBO 40 & OVER · 8.5 MEN LOCAL AT STATE

15 players · average NTRP 4.17 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-18vs KY\HEN\RobinsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesPhilip Chaney / Bradley Gordon vs Andrew Liu / Ryan Middendorf2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBrian Dunn / John Cook vs Jim Latham / Bernard Howard6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2024-10-18vs KY\HEN\RobinsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRajat Kapoor / Shane Cunningham vs Jay Clark / Chris Allen2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesStuart Ditsler / Bryan Tincher vs Jack Cline / Britt Decker7-6, 6-2
2024-10-18vs KY\HEN\RobinsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Reeder / David Mishloney vs Jay Clark / Chris Allen3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChip Gilmour / Russell Miesner vs Audie Wilson / Jack Cline6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 MEN LOCAL AT STATE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
David Reeder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
Stuart Ditsler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.27
Rick Mount
published
Chip Gilmour
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Clark Stone
published 4.5
4.00
Shane Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Russell Miesner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Michael Mehlbauer
published
3.92
Jeffrey Popham
published
3.88
David Mishloney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
John Cook
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Brett Sofie
published 4
3.54
Grant Delaney
published
3.26
Bryan Tincher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Philip Chaney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rick Mount + David Reeder404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Reeder
44W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%63%37%
4.45
Stuart Ditsler
15W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
Rick Mount
27W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Chip Gilmour
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Clark Stone
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
4.05
Shane Cunningham
22W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%50%50%
4.00
Russell Miesner
36W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.98
Michael Mehlbauer
6W–16L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.96
Jeffrey Popham
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.92
4
David Mishloney
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.88
John Cook
30W–37L career · 1 line in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Brett Sofie
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.65
Grant Delaney
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Bryan Tincher
18W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Philip Chaney
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.