Teams

QRRC Aguilera

2025 OH OV WINTER A18&O · 2025 Winter A18&O 3.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 Winter A18&O 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Carter Tisdale
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.49
Kyle Webb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Travis Fox
published
3.45
Sam Dowse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Jeffrey Nabholz
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.42
Shaun Johannes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Clayton Burkle
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Kyle Nagel
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.31
Rodolfo Aguilera
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.31
Ariz Anklesaria
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Mike Madoffori
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Jansen Meyers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Tom Jakel
published
Keith Boroczk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kyle Webb + Jansen Meyers181453% games+4.5% vs expected
Clayton Burkle + Ariz Anklesaria4943% games+3.9% vs expected
Kyle Nagel + Keith Boroczk10361% games+2.2% vs expected
Kyle Webb + Mike Madoffori5258% games−1.2% vs expected
Kyle Nagel + Mike Madoffori5355% games−5.3% vs expected
Mike Madoffori + Keith Boroczk7753% games−9.0% vs expected
Mike Madoffori + Sam Dowse5167% gamesnot enough data
Jansen Meyers + Clayton Burkle6065% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carter Tisdale
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Kyle Webb
174W–101L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Travis Fox
15W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
Sam Dowse
58W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Jeffrey Nabholz
38W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Shaun Johannes
65W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Clayton Burkle
112W–79L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Kyle Nagel
62W–54L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Rodolfo Aguilera
121W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Ariz Anklesaria
93W–62L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Mike Madoffori
76W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Jansen Meyers
138W–70L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Tom Jakel
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Keith Boroczk
77W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.