Teams

Bang Bang

2021 18&Over Men · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-21vs On Court TerrorsLost 23
L#1 DoublesJuan Vega / Michael Huh vs Peter Ortiz / Christian Ullrich5-7, 4-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesClint Tomlinson vs Vladimir Kezik6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesThomas Kim / Neil Labay vs Anthony Lizares / Nam Cho2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSonny Kwok Kui vs Daniyal Jafarey6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBill Kim / Ben Ryu vs Allan Bellinger / Jose Pinal1-6, 2-6
2021-07-14vs Hudson AcesWon 31
W#1 DoublesJames Ong / Juan Vega vs Muhammad Romman Shoaib / Jonathan D Wu7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAsim Burman / Perry Fishkind vs Debasish Chakraborty / Jenish Jariwala6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesClint Tomlinson vs Jordan Suero6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPatrick Hsu / Bill Kim vs Morgan Hill / Colin Merry4-6, 3-6
2021-07-01vs Team MoonLost 04
L#1 DoublesNick Caputo / Perry Fishkind vs Brett Howard / Bobby Choe3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesClint Tomlinson vs Mark Shapovalov1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJuan Vega / Neil Labay vs Sebastian Luna-Villanueva / Duncan LaMonte3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSonny Kwok Kui / Edgar Cala vs John Moon / Andrew Eisen2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-06-23vs YamaGSMLost 23
L#1 DoublesJames Ong / Bill Kim vs Pieter Goes / Jay Song1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesPerry Fishkind vs Bo Li2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Huh / Edgar Cala vs Sharan Mirchandani / Jiangping Yu1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesNick Caputo vs Damian Jee6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAsim Burman / Neil Labay vs Henry Greenfield / Vipul Kant6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-16vs On Court TerrorsWon 31
W#1 DoublesPerry Fishkind / Nick Caputo vs Peter Ortiz / Christian Ullrich6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPatrick Hsu / Asim Burman vs Nam Cho / Kirk Tsahalis4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJames Ong vs Vladimir Kezik7-6, 3-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBen Ryu / Edgar Cala vs Daniyal Jafarey / Aoun Jafarey5-7, 2-6
2021-06-10vs Hudson AcesLost 13
W#1 DoublesAsim Burman / Michael Huh vs Jenish Jariwala / Jonathan D Wu6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSonny Kwok Kui / Edgar Cala vs Daniel Plotnick / Debasish Chakraborty3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesNeil Labay vs Kunal Rana1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick Hsu / Bill Kim vs Manish Malevar / Muhammad Romman Shoaib4-6, 1-6
2021-05-26vs Team MoonLost 13
L#1 DoublesMichael Huh / Bill Kim vs Marijus Kuzavas / Zhendong Zhang2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesClint Tomlinson / Ben Ryu vs MAREK OSTASZ / Duncan LaMonte3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSonny Kwok Kui vs Andre Yang2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesThomas Kim / Neil Labay vs Bobby Choe / Giorgio Valentini6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1YamaGSM07241124246
2Bang Bang07142149361
3Team Moon08281230311
4On Court Terrors08132760411

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

James Ong
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.77
Perry Fishkind
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.32
Clint Tomlinson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Edgar Cala
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Bill Kim
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Juan Vega
published
Michael Huh
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Neil Labay
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Nick Caputo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Patrick Hsu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sonny Kwok Kui
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Huh + Patrick Hsu224 matchesnot enough data
Edgar Cala + Neil Labay134 matchesnot enough data
Patrick Hsu + Neil Labay404 matchesnot enough data
Michael Huh + Nick Caputo213 matchesnot enough data
Bill Kim + Patrick Hsu033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
James Ong
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Perry Fishkind
31W–16L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Clint Tomlinson
192W–174L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Edgar Cala
48W–136L career · 10 lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.02
Bill Kim
16W–15L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Juan Vega
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Huh
64W–41L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Neil Labay
40W–33L career · 11 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nick Caputo
52W–24L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Patrick Hsu
49W–32L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sonny Kwok Kui
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.