Teams

CAC/SL-Top Guns-Wanat

2021 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.32 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-10-31Won 30
W#1 DoublesPeter Kim-Himmelfarb / Crystal Garnes vs Glynn Omoto / Erin Schiller6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAngie Nawalany / Michal Nawalany vs Chad Swiney / Julie Brumley6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChrissy O'Rourke / Bret O'Rourke vs Jared Garrison / Heather Robertson6-2, 6-1
2020-10-24vs FC-Basha 6.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesTony Giannini / Crystal Garnes vs Wilfred Amsden / Sarah Tattersall6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDoni Wanat / Marie Fahey vs Martin O'Leary / Susan Leaman6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichal Nawalany / Angie Nawalany vs Joseph Allison / Susan Tricarico6-2, 6-1
2020-10-10vs MC-6.0 Red Team-JayLost 02
L#1 DoublesDoni Wanat / Marie Fahey vs Ashley Jay / Lynn Maung4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesEdward Hocker / Carisa Betancourt vs Dong Tran / Nicki Nguyen-Colvin3-6, 5-7
2020-10-03Lost 02
L#2 DoublesEdward Hocker / Carisa Betancourt vs Suanty Kaghan / Jordan Brower6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAngie Nawalany / Daniel Stark vs Kathryn Sullivan / Tom Sullivan7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2020-09-26vs ETC-TopSpinners-KrishnamoorthySplit 11
W#1 DoublesPeter Kim-Himmelfarb / Marie Fahey vs Anita Marrero / Amit Mahajan7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesEdward Hocker / Carisa Betancourt vs Jacky Grotle / Ajoy Krishnamoorthy4-6, 1-6
2020-09-12Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDoni Wanat / Crystal Garnes vs Jonathan Alford / Katie Busby7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBret O'Rourke / Chrissy O'Rourke vs Catherine Day / Matthew Day1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings34 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC-TopSpinners-Krishnamoorthy601625106
2ETC-Titans 6.0-Box601536117
3MC-6.0 Mx-Ngo60144887
4MC-6.0 Red Team-Jay511448118
5PSC-Chen511449118
6AYTC-The Craziest Ones-Louie5114411127
7ETC-Acuario5113511129
8TCSP-Out of the Blue-Chou5112613121
9AYTC (OUTDOORS) Kim5111717157
10BTA-Lalime4213510126
11FC-Petriuc4213512144
12BTA-Mixed-Day4211719141
13ETC-Buck4211719162
14Lower Woodland-Love All-Hardie4210820160
15BC-Sedghinasab3381023168
16BTA-Smith3371124176
17ETC-Mixed Fun-Gardai249917156
18CAC/SL-Top Guns-Wanat249919153
19TCSP-Double Trouble-Arron249920159
20BETC-mix it up-Shutt2471123167
21ETC-Punishers-Yang2471124186
22AYTC (OUTDOORS) Ma2481024177
23Lower Woodland-Tuesdays with Joey-Goyal2471125169
24TCSP-Tonkin2461225164
25AYTC-Team 110-Asatiani2461226179
26AYTC (OUTDOORS) Apple Orchard All Stars 2-Frondozo2461226188
27TCSP-Mixed-Stuart2451328197
28BC-Brandenfels1551327184
29TCSP-Lerer1551328175
30TCSP-Vincent/Lu1541429186
31ETC-Onu1541430192
32EDG-Higgins0661226195
33TCSP-Net Setters-James0631531198
34FC-Basha 6.00621633211

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Angie Nawalany
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.43
Peter Kim-Himmelfarb
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.27
Marie Fahey
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Danielle Wanat
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Doni Wanat
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Edward Hocker
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Nancy Whittaker
published
3.06
Chrissy O'Rourke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Crystal Garnes
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.74
Daniel Stark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Bret O'Rourke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.13
Carisa Betancourt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Michal Nawalany
published
Si Won Choi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edward Hocker + Carisa Betancourt7454% games+2.7% vs expected
Danielle Wanat + Doni Wanat101048% games−7.3% vs expected
Chrissy O'Rourke + Bret O'Rourke152247% games−7.5% vs expected
Danielle Wanat + Si Won Choi5256% gamesnot enough data
Carisa Betancourt + Daniel Stark2342% gamesnot enough data
Marie Fahey + Doni Wanat213 matchesnot enough data
Marie Fahey + Bret O'Rourke213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angie Nawalany
87W–28L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.92
3.5
Peter Kim-Himmelfarb
146W–75L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Marie Fahey
109W–65L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Danielle Wanat
98W–46L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Doni Wanat
103W–133L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Edward Hocker
96W–82L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Whittaker
21W–33L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Chrissy O'Rourke
109W–79L career · 2 lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Crystal Garnes
63W–38L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Daniel Stark
36W–60L career · 1 line in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Bret O'Rourke
60W–70L career · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
2.5
Carisa Betancourt
54W–111L career · 3 lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Michal Nawalany
15W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Si Won Choi
66W–61L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.