← Teams

IRV-Lyon

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Deborah Naugler
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.78
Libby North
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.76
Lisa Lyon
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.70
Jan Rothert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Tara Hendrickson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.27
Char Riley
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
—
Jen Woods
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 0
Results12 ties
2019-06-29Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesChar Riley / Deirdre Harms vs Joanne Berg / Lori Nicol6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2019-06-28Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesChar Riley / Deirdre Harms vs Julie Clark / Marla Volpe6-3, 6-4
2019-03-31Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesLisa Lyon / Mary Ann Seeger vs Jeannine del Bene / Gwen Matthews7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChar Riley / Cathy Porter vs Catherine Crosby / Nancy Korenek-Leveque7-6, 7-5
W#2 SinglesLibby North vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMary Elliott / Jan Rothert vs Brenna Dramov / Cathie Recker6-3, 6-1
2019-03-16Lost 1–2
L#1 SinglesLibby North vs Sally Sterling6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Lyon / Deirdre Harms vs Lisa Handley / Nikki Metcalf6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Elliott / Jen Woods vs Linda Lovett / Kim Stevens3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2019-03-08Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesLisa Lyon / Deborah Naugler vs Julia Karlin / Sammy Bui6-1, 6-4
2019-03-01Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesLisa Lyon / Jan Rothert vs Diana Almy / Heidi Clark6-2, 6-4
2019-02-16Won 2–0
W#1 SinglesLisa Lyon vs RENEE VANDEGRIEND6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCathy Porter / Jen Woods vs Susan Ford / Carol Chiu6-2, 7-5
2019-01-26Won 3–1
W#1 SinglesTara Hendrickson vs Anne Brandenburger6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Lyon / Deirdre Harms - * vs Kana Wakamatsu / Emiko Kogure6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLibby North vs Leonor Diaz del Castillo6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesChar Riley / Amy Alpern vs Sharon Kim-Geib / Takumi Koyama6-4, 6-3
2019-01-20Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesLisa Lyon / Cathy Porter vs Rochelle Hart / Karen McNairy6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChar Riley / Antoinette Ann Reno vs Brandy Horwitz / Kirsten Giacomini6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesTara Hendrickson vs Aracelia Hettle6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJan Rothert / Jen Woods vs Joelle Lewis / Marie Picard7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2019-01-13Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesAmy Alpern / Jen Woods vs Elizabeth Lilly / Rebecca Roberts7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTara Hendrickson vs Pam Saftler6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChar Riley / Antoinette Ann Reno vs Samantha Esmer / Jill Craven6-3, 6-3
2018-12-02Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesChar Riley / Kate Hunter vs Catherine Go / Kim Stevens6-3, 6-1
2018-12-01Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesJan Rothert / Linda Paulk vs Lynn Sosa / Erica Tsuruta6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Deborah Naugler
98W–63L career
5%95%0%
4.07
4
Libby North
51W–49L career
0%99%1%
3.78
4
Lisa Lyon
91W–68L career
0%99%0%
3.76
4
Jan Rothert
39W–28L career
8%91%1%
3.70
4
Tara Hendrickson
71W–65L career
2%98%0%
3.70
3.5
Char Riley
37W–47L career
1%98%1%
3.27
0
Jen Woods
11W–7L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.