Teams

MCTA75/Fraas/SUNC

75 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-13vs HHTL75/Arboe/Spring LakeWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoan Schier / Marya Hicks vs Pat Kenworthy / Ashild Athanas6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKarol Beverley / Sandra Stigant vs Donna Smorol / Kathy Freer6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCandi DeLaar / Libby Fraas vs Linda Benning / Karen Ricker6-7, 3-2
2024-10-12vs UPTA75A/Walker/CardinalWon 21
L#1 DoublesKarol Beverley / Sandra Stigant vs Jane Foster / Mary Ann Staudt3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMarsha Rutherford / Linda Jester vs Bobbie Cancelliere / Henrietta Walker6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJoan Schier / Marya Hicks vs Tracy Hardaway / Dee Stone6-1, 6-0
2024-10-12vs LCTA/BATHLost 12
L#1 DoublesKarol Beverley / Libby Fraas vs Renee Lowry / Gloria Prindle3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMarsha Rutherford / Linda Jester vs Linda Buchanan / Frances Bath3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMarya Hicks / Joan Schier vs Linda Common / Sharon Bortner6-1, 6-1
2024-10-11vs HHTL75/Iulo/Spring LakeWon 30
W#1 DoublesCandi DeLaar / Libby Fraas vs Catherine Forlenza / Christine Iulo6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSandra Stigant / Karol Beverley vs Lois McKinley / Reenee Nardi3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJane Camburn / Marsha Rutherford vs Mimi Stevenson / Barbara Martin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-11vs MCTA75/Fox/RHTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoan Schier / Sandra Stigant vs Teresa Brown / Suzanne Roxburgh3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Jester / Marsha Rutherford vs Barbara Sellers / Jeanne Stone4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarya Hicks / Libby Fraas vs Tina DeCarli / Trudy Collins6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Candi DeLaar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jane Camburn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joan Schier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Karol Beverley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Libby Fraas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Linda Jester
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marsha Rutherford
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Marya Hicks
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sandra Stigant
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marya Hicks + Joan Schier303 matchesnot enough data
Karol Beverley + Sandra Stigant213 matchesnot enough data
Linda Jester + Marsha Rutherford213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Candi DeLaar
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jane Camburn
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Joan Schier
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Karol Beverley
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Libby Fraas
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Jester
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marsha Rutherford
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marya Hicks
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Stigant
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.