Teams

Sellers/18/3.5/WD/CCLA

2023 City Championship 18 & Over - Women Day · 3.5 (18&O) Women Day

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings9 teams · 3.5 (18&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jeansonne/18/WD/BOC71301026268
2Kozar/18/3.5/WD/UC71281228300
3Bordelon/18/3.5/WD/BREC53241636324
4Sellers/18/3.5/WD/CCLA53241639330
5Bogan/18/3.5/WD/BRCC53241640329
6Loupe/18/3.5/WD/BOC35122861411
7Moody/18/3.5/WD/BREC26142656397
8Johnson/18/3.5/WD/YMCA26112964432
9Labbe/18/3.5/WD/BREC08132757415

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Lori Kinchen
published
3.49
Laurie Linehan
published
3.46
Leslie Houser
published
3.42
Cherie Favaro
published 3.5
3.41
Cheryl Moreaux
published 3.5
3.38
Jenny Rome
published
3.32
Ellen Pino
published 3.5
3.31
Tricia Bruno
published
3.29
Alletia Sellers
published 3.5
Jessica Johnson
published 3.5
3.19
TIne Neames
published
3.04
Christy Mendoza
published 3.5
2.96
Marsha Jumonville
published
2.77
Terri Baldwin
published
2.72
Shelli St Romain
published
Joanne Harvey
published
Julia Boyce
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Kinchen + Cheryl Moreaux4256% games+5.4% vs expected
Cherie Favaro + Tricia Bruno7457% games+1.9% vs expected
Christy Mendoza + Jenny Rome8353% games−0.1% vs expected
Alletia Sellers + Tricia Bruno4949% games−3.8% vs expected
Cherie Favaro + Leslie Houser4155% gamesnot enough data
Cherie Favaro + Alletia Sellers1446% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Houser + Tricia Bruno5073% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Moreaux + Jenny Rome4156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Kinchen
53W–24L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.58
Laurie Linehan
56W–35L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.49
Leslie Houser
40W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Cherie Favaro
52W–50L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Cheryl Moreaux
42W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.41
Jenny Rome
45W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Ellen Pino
32W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
Tricia Bruno
43W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Alletia Sellers
33W–34L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Jessica Johnson
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
TIne Neames
49W–55L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Christy Mendoza
19W–22L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.04
Marsha Jumonville
10W–18L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
Terri Baldwin
30W–40L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
Shelli St Romain
20W–33L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
2.72
Joanne Harvey
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julia Boyce
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.