Teams

WP-O YELLOW

2026 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-17vs WP NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesLindsey Gibbons / Matt Tomarchio vs Tess Batchelder / Scott Jeffrey5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRamon Li / Karen Ikegami vs Joseph Abdo / Virginia Foster4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-05-10vs EM GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Ikegami / Kunal Parikh vs Andy Olree / Michele Olree6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Maugel / Landon Miller vs Hayes Trotter / Kelly Trotter7-6
W#3 DoublesMaud Moir / Brian Kozik vs Jean Steimel / David Steimel6-1, 6-4
2026-05-03vs CACM REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesRamon Li / Maud Moir vs Zachary Hustad / Katherine Cuevas4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLindsey Gibbons / Matt Tomarchio vs Seamus Doyle / Eden Parker2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Sierra / Soudabeh Kargar vs Rick Lannon / Casey Thomas0-6, 2-6
2026-04-26vs SKY ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesLizzy Donaher / Kunal Parikh vs Jennifer Parnell / Tom Parnell6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoe Nguyen / Laura Maugel vs Jeff Hutcheson / Kerry Hutcheson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Kozik / Lindsey Gibbons vs Kim Brummond / Eric Brummond6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-04-19vs GAC GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesLandon Miller / Lizzy Donaher vs Brian Tanner / Frankie Robinson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRamon Li / Karen Ikegami vs Jerry Augustin / Carol Thornock6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDaniel Sierra / Maud Moir vs Ben Dannenberg / Anna Stansbury5-7, 0-6
2026-04-12vs WP NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesKunal Parikh / Lizzy Donaher vs John Randall / Virginia Foster6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Ikegami / Matt Tomarchio vs Neil Ziemba / Tess Batchelder3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoe Nguyen / Soudabeh Kargar vs Gary Beck / Gloria Clark0-6, 4-6
2026-04-05vs EM GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesMatt Tomarchio / Soudabeh Kargar vs Jll McLain / David McLain2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoe Nguyen / Laura Maugel vs Michele Olree / Andy Olree7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Kozik / Lindsey Gibbons vs Jason Zink / Melissa Zink2-6, 4-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTA-C BLACK6116515181
2WP PURPLE5113511138
3MC SILVER5214717168
4WP TEAL5214717180
5PRC YELLOW4391229218
6BTA-IBM YELLOW2581327213
7WP NAVY2571430204
8NJ BLACK2561531214
9SS-HP GREEN2571431205
10WP-O YELLOW2561534225
11BP SILVER2551634216
12PCRK BLUE1651633229
13TTA YELLOW0641428196
14CK GREEN0721939247

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Laura Maugel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Karen Ikegami
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Ramon Li
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Brian Kozik
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.84
Soudabeh Kargar
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Lindsey Gibbons
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Daniel Sierra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Joe Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kunal Parikh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Landon Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lizzy Donaher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Matt Tomarchio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Maud Moir
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsey Gibbons + Brian Kozik5350% gamesnot enough data
Joe Nguyen + Lindsey Gibbons2441% gamesnot enough data
Joe Nguyen + Lizzy Donaher224 matchesnot enough data
Lindsey Gibbons + Matt Tomarchio123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Maugel
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Karen Ikegami
9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Ramon Li
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
3
Brian Kozik
17W–11L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Soudabeh Kargar
18W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Lindsey Gibbons
18W–16L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Daniel Sierra
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Joe Nguyen
11W–18L career · 8 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.75
Kunal Parikh
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Landon Miller
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lizzy Donaher
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Matt Tomarchio
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maud Moir
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.