Teams

LBHarris/NMP

2022 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Women 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-09vs LHHUGHES/JettonWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrooke Harris / Lisa Carlyle vs Karen Cooper / Natalie Reid6-1, 6-4
2022-05-02vs LD-Mikolajczyk/PeninsulaWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin MacAulay / Lisa Carlyle vs Katie Philpott / Andrea Aunon6-3, 6-1
2022-04-25vs LABonnamour/TrumpWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Whittington / Kelly Grathwohl vs Alix Bonnamour / Alison Cooper6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNicole Biffle / Lisa Carlyle vs Laura Gottlieb / Jessica Babington6-3, 6-1
2022-04-11vs LSMalmstrom/Westport 18s 3.0Won 10
W#1 SinglesKelly Grathwohl vs Kelly Greffin6-0, 6-0
2022-03-28vs LHHUGHES/JettonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ross / Lisa Carlyle vs Heidi Poulton / Gina van Nortwick6-0, 6-1
2022-03-21vs LD-Mikolajczyk/PeninsulaWon 20
W#1 DoublesNicole Biffle / Lisa Carlyle vs Danielle Mikolajczyk / Bonnie Zentner5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Grathwohl / Julie Whittington vs Lori Holmes / Michele Devinney6-0, 6-0
2022-03-14vs LABonnamour/TrumpSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ross / Lisa Carlyle vs Cindy Smithy / Jennifer Lefebvre6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesWhitney Ketner / Kelly Grathwohl vs Alix Bonnamour / Jessica Babington3-6, 2-6
2022-02-28vs LSHayes/River RunWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Carlyle / Trish Armstrong vs Courtney Seiter / Sue Hayes6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Lisa Carlyle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.29
Erin MacAulay
published 3.5
3.22
Trish Armstrong
published
2.95
Colleen Yura
published 3
2.90
Judy Frye
published
2.86
Kelly Grathwohl
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.84
Lauren Verlander
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lisa Carlyle
120W–65L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Erin MacAulay
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Trish Armstrong
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3
Colleen Yura
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
Judy Frye
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Kelly Grathwohl
91W–118L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
Lauren Verlander
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Bridgette Ashbrook
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.