Teams

LATA40/Mathews/SSP

2025 Mixed 40 & Over - USTA · 3.5 Adult Mixed Doubles

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-15vs LATA40-Henderson-LCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesBarry Mathews / Susan Mathews vs Wayne Kohlmyer / Page Edwards6-2, 6-2
2025-07-08vs LATA40/Harrison/SSPWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Mathews / Barry Mathews vs Sharon Steinbacher / Duke Taylor6-1, 6-2
2025-06-13vs LATA40-Henderson-LCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Mathews / Barry Mathews vs Dargan Gore / Kelly Berryhill5-7, 3-6
2025-06-10vs LATA40/Coyle/LCTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Mathews / Barry Mathews vs Nitin Jain / Lisa Maylath6-0, 6-1
2025-05-20vs LATA40/Harrison/SSPWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarry Mathews / Susan Mathews vs Sharon Steinbacher / Duke Taylor6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Deidre Neuberg
published 3.5
3.52
Barry Mathews
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.50
Susan Mathews
published
3.43
Missy Graczyk
published
3.41
Gerald Simpson
published
3.39
Cindy Bane
published 3.5
3.38
Paulette Nulman
published
3.38
Brian Tolley
published 3.5
3.37
Kemper Amick
published
3.32
Terrance Wingfield
published
3.29
Maryann Simons
published
3.27
Teresa Tracy
published
3.21
Chandler Price
published 3.5
Lucas Berresford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Mathews + Barry Mathews17360% games+7.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deidre Neuberg
86W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.65
3.5
Barry Mathews
212W–65L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Susan Mathews
39W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Missy Graczyk
25W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Gerald Simpson
117W–43L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Cindy Bane
81W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Paulette Nulman
34W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Brian Tolley
57W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kemper Amick
27W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Terrance Wingfield
42W–26L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Maryann Simons
16W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Teresa Tracy
44W–23L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Chandler Price
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Lucas Berresford
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.