Teams

RCCB - Heyn

2024 Brevard Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-10-11vs Brevard/Luis/55&Over7.0MXDLost 02
L#1 DoublesNan Fleming / Don Cork vs Gisela Alcalde / Marcus Lumpkin4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTrisha Watson / Virgil Watson vs Terry Taylor / David Parsons0-6, 2-6
2024-10-04vs Rockledge - DonovanLost 01
L#1 DoublesLouis Heyn / Michele Heyn vs Jay Amburgey / Tina Amburgey1-6, 4-6
2024-09-27vs EFSC - SimmonsLost 01
L#1 DoublesNan Fleming / Don Cork vs Kim Viesins / David Norris4-6, 5-7
2024-09-20vs Brevard/Luis/55&Over7.0MXDLost 01
L#3 DoublesVirgil Watson / Trisha Watson vs Terry Taylor / David Parsons0-6, 3-6
2024-09-15vs Rockledge - DonovanWon 20
W#1 DoublesLouis Heyn / Michele Heyn vs John Donovan / Sandy Dahl2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDon Cork / Nan Fleming vs Mary Beardall / James Rothe7-6, 6-3
2024-09-06vs EFSC - SimmonsLost 01
L#3 DoublesTrisha Watson / Virgil Watson vs Cynthia Simmons / Thomas Armstrong2-6, 2-6
2024-08-23vs Brevard/Luis/55&Over7.0MXDLost 02
L#1 DoublesNan Fleming / Don Cork vs Gisela Alcalde / Kevin Landress5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Heyn / William Quinter vs Susan Douglas / Santana Luis1-6, 1-6
2024-08-16vs Rockledge - DonovanWon 20
W#1 DoublesLouis Heyn / Nan Fleming vs James Hartnett / Christine Small0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichele Heyn / Jeffrey Finn vs Melinda Hartnett / Donald Small4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-09vs EFSC - SimmonsLost 02
L#1 DoublesNan Fleming / Louis Heyn vs Xu Sue Huang / Terry Lane6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichele Heyn / Jeffrey Finn vs Kim Viesins / Christopher Barnby4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Michele Heyn
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.09
Sandra Edwards
published
2.91
Trisha Watson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.87
Megan Holthaus
published
Louis Heyn
published
Nan Fleming
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Robert Coker
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michele Heyn
109W–104L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.42
Sandra Edwards
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Trisha Watson
130W–177L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.91
Megan Holthaus
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
2.87
Louis Heyn
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nan Fleming
56W–66L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Coker
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.