Teams

NTC-Foley

2026 Adult 18 & Over · Open Men

10 players · average NTRP 5.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-17vs NWW-AYTC-TaisLost 02
L#1 SinglesPiers Foley vs Hans PODLIPNIK Castillo2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGrant Riechmann / Nikita Pereverzin vs Charles Thompson / Kyle Everly0-6, 3-6
2026-05-10vs SVC (OUTDOORS) ShmotolokhaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesVivid Wu / Thomas Plunkett vs Nikola Frljanic / Stefan Frljanic3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKawika Lam / Mitch Stewart vs Maxim Shmotolokha / Alex Braksator6-3, 6-2
2026-05-03vs SVC (OUTDOORS) ShmotolokhaWon 30
W#1 DoublesJake Faundez / Grant Riechmann vs Maxim Shmotolokha / Cooper Anderson6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesPiers Foley vs Alex Braksator6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMatthew Dunn / Nikita Pereverzin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-25vs TUK-CobbSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPiers Foley / Chris Vrabel vs Branden Muraki / Andrew Huang6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGrant Riechmann / Thomas Plunkett vs Connor Vordale / Winston Ngo4-6, 3-6
2026-04-19vs NWW-AYTC-TaisWon 10
W#1 SinglesMitch Stewart vs Kyle Everly6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Open Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.96 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.09
Jake Faundez
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
4.94
Kawika Lam
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.86
Chris Vrabel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Grant Riechmann
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Matthew Dunn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mitch Stewart
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nikita Pereverzin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Piers Foley
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas Plunkett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Vivid Wu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kawika Lam + Chris Vrabel5260% games+1.8% vs expected
Matthew Dunn + Chris Vrabel9359% gamesnot enough data
Kawika Lam + Matthew Dunn1544% gamesnot enough data
Jake Faundez + Kawika Lam5070% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jake Faundez
19W–3L career · 11 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
5.09
5
Kawika Lam
33W–11L career · 12 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.94
5
Chris Vrabel
32W–13L career · 11 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.86
Grant Riechmann
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Matthew Dunn
18W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mitch Stewart
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nikita Pereverzin
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Piers Foley
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Plunkett
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vivid Wu
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.