Teams

LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV

2023 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 40 & OVER · 3.5 MEN- 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-02-18vs SPANISH OAKSWon 10
W#2 DoublesRoger Martinez / Troy Fenn vs Dan Hale / Joseph Engle3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-01-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesDarwin Telada / Troy Fenn vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-01-21vs NV/KOLEK/ADULT40&OVER/M3.5Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJackson Johnson / Matthew Cox vs Robert Martin / Earl Peralta1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDarwin Telada / Yang Zhong vs George Mulopulos / Brett Wachter2-6, 0-6
2023-01-14vs RED ROCK CCLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Carlson / Mauricio Vejar vs Gregory Dorn / Tom Tanksley2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MEN- 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Darwin Telada
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Mauricio Vejar
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.15
Troy Fenn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Roger Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.89
Jackson Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Derrick Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Steven Hawkes
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.62
Corey Zimet
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
Matthew Cox
published
Michael Gleason
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Parviz Heshmati
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
Yang Zhong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Parviz Heshmati + Corey Zimet7359% games+10.5% vs expected
Parviz Heshmati + Roger Martinez5451% games+6.6% vs expected
Roger Martinez + Corey Zimet10557% games+4.2% vs expected
Steven Hawkes + Roger Martinez81246% games+3.5% vs expected
Steven Hawkes + Derrick Hunter8552% games+3.3% vs expected
Matthew Cox + Roger Martinez10852% games+2.9% vs expected
Roger Martinez + Derrick Hunter7448% games+2.6% vs expected
Darwin Telada + Roger Martinez3647% games−2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Darwin Telada
23W–31L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Mauricio Vejar
46W–66L career · 7 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Troy Fenn
20W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
Roger Martinez
108W–128L career · 7 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
Jackson Johnson
10W–36L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%78%21%
2.89
3
Derrick Hunter
61W–63L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Steven Hawkes
84W–85L career · 13 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Corey Zimet
103W–143L career · 13 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.62
Matthew Cox
30W–30L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Gleason
18W–24L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Parviz Heshmati
36W–27L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Carlson
48W–35L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Yang Zhong
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.