Teams

AG RED

2025 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME DOUBLES - MOUNTAINS

12 players · average NTRP 2.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-25vs BASALT BLACKLost 03
L#1 DoublesArlene Goetz / Pamela Niro vs Amy Daniel / Susie Demers6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGay Wisch / Carolyn Hayes vs Richlyn Pavcek / Diana Ray7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesClaire Green / Leelee Harriman vs TONI COURTENAY / Walker Simmons6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-07-18vs BASALT BLACKWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Huntsman / Mary Jo Murphy vs Lynsey Pulliam / Shauna de Moraes6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGay Wisch / Carolyn Hayes vs Richlyn Pavcek / Brooke Stott6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Parker / Leelee Harriman vs TONI COURTENAY / Lauren Raymond6-4, 6-1
2025-07-11vs BASALT BLACKLost 02
L#1 DoublesBarbara Sport / Linda Huntsman vs Amy Daniel / Stephanie Hayes3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Parker / May Storey vs Brooke Stott / Lauren Raymond2-6, 3-6
2025-06-27vs BASALT BLACKLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Sport / Claire Green vs Brooke Stott / Anne Goldberg2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGay Wisch / May Storey vs Richlyn Pavcek / Stephanie Hayes5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Huntsman / Carolyn Hayes vs Lauren Raymond / Walker Simmons5-7, 6-7
2025-06-20vs BASALT BLACKLost 03
L#1 DoublesArlene Goetz / Barbara Sport vs Shauna de Moraes / Carolyn Strautman2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Brugler / Pamela Niro vs Colleen Barill / Diana Ray5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGay Wisch / Leelee Harriman vs Lynsey Pulliam / Susie Demers4-1
2025-06-13vs BASALT BLACKLost 12
L#1 DoublesArlene Goetz / Leelee Harriman vs Anne Goldberg / Carolyn Strautman4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMary Jo Murphy / Jennifer Parker vs Stephanie Hayes / Colleen Barill1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Huntsman / Carolyn Hayes vs Lauren Raymond / TONI COURTENAY6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-06vs BASALT BLACKLost 03
L#1 DoublesArlene Goetz / Mary Jo Murphy vs Anne Goldberg / Shauna de Moraes7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBarbara Sport / Gay Wisch vs Richlyn Pavcek / Stephanie Hayes4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMay Storey / Claire Green vs Walker Simmons / Brooke Stott1-6, 2-6
2025-05-30vs BASALT BLACKLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Sport / May Storey vs Carolyn Strautman / Shauna de Moraes1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Huntsman / Jennifer Parker vs Walker Simmons / Anne Goldberg4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMary Jo Murphy / Pamela Niro vs Brooke Stott / Richlyn Pavcek6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME DOUBLES - MOUNTAINS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AG RED1742041270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Mary Jo Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Linda Huntsman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Claire Green
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Arlene Goetz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Carolyn Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Gay Wisch
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.60
Pamela Niro
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.35
Barbara Sport
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Jennifer Parker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Leelee Harriman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
May Storey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Nancy Brugler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Hayes + Gay Wisch3257% games+5.1% vs expected
Arlene Goetz + Pamela Niro134 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Sport + Gay Wisch134 matchesnot enough data
Claire Green + Barbara Sport123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Jo Murphy + Linda Huntsman303 matchesnot enough data
Mary Jo Murphy + Pamela Niro303 matchesnot enough data
Linda Huntsman + Pamela Niro213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Jo Murphy
9W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Linda Huntsman
10W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Claire Green
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Arlene Goetz
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Carolyn Hayes
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Gay Wisch
6W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Pamela Niro
18W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
2.5
Barbara Sport
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.35
Jennifer Parker
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leelee Harriman
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
May Storey
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Brugler
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.