Teams

V - Las Posas Empty Nesters

2023 USTA Mixed 55 &Over · V - Mixed 7.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.36 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-11-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesGina Howey / Gordon Almquist vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-20vs V - DAM Ball WACkers 55+Won 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Gisler / Walter Burstein vs Debbie Redman / Tim Bearer6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-10-15vs V - North Ranch ScrewballsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMadeleine Lindvall / Bengt Johansson vs Amy Whitney / Bill Sutman2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Gisler / Wade Price vs Sonia Bekian / John Lyon1-6, 2-6
2023-09-15vs V - DAM Ball WACkers 55+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBengt Johansson / Julie Gisler vs Paul Gianini / Mary Scotti4-6, 2-6
2023-09-09vs V - North Ranch ScrewballsLost 12
W#1 DoublesBengt Johansson / Madeleine Lindvall vs Susan Cook / Richard Cook5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWalter Burstein / Gina Howey vs Shari Schiff / Michael Schiff3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesScott Runyon / Ginger Kohler vs Silvia Benun / John Lyon1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for V - Mixed 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Madeleine Lindvall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.20
Julie Gisler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Walter Burstein
published
3.19
Shannon Price
published
3.10
Rene Randel
published
3.08
Deanna Sonnenberg
published 3.5
3.07
Laura Kiker
published
3.04
Jean Salcido
published
3.01
Bengt Johansson
published 3.5
2.90
Scott Runyon
published
2.74
Gina Howey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.57
Ginger Kohler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Catalina Wise
published 3
John Wise
published
Sharon Erickson
published
Steven Yamamoto
published
Wendy Spasiano
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Madeleine Lindvall
118W–141L career · 2 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Julie Gisler
124W–126L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Walter Burstein
6W–17L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Shannon Price
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Rene Randel
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Deanna Sonnenberg
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Laura Kiker
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.07
Jean Salcido
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
3.5
Bengt Johansson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
Scott Runyon
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Gina Howey
44W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Ginger Kohler
24W–47L career · 1 line in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Catalina Wise
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
John Wise
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon Erickson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Steven Yamamoto
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wendy Spasiano
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.