Teams

South Jordan-Christensen

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 2.5W PM

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-06vs Liberty Hills Tennis-OlsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesJordan Korth / Sarah Robertson vs Liz Bell / Millie Olson4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMadison Milligan vs Erin Massey1-6, 1-6
2022-05-16vs Liberty Hills Tennis-OlsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJordan Korth / Sarah Robertson vs Kassie Belcher / Erin Massey6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoyce Christensen / Pallavi Darbhamulla vs MacY Bell / Gretchen Pettey3-6, 2-6
2022-05-09Won 10
W#1 SinglesJordan Korth vs Ashley Wright6-2, 6-2
2022-05-02Won 20
W#1 SinglesJordan Korth vs Tori Locke4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMadison Milligan / Enguun Narangerel vs Stephanie Willis / Olivia Moreton4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-25vs Liberty Hills Tennis-OlsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesElle Bain / Andie Ranck vs Liz Bell / Rebecca Anderson0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJordan Korth / Sarah Robertson vs Teresa Jackson / Millie Olson2-6, 3-6
2022-04-18vs Salt Lake Tennis-WrightWon 30
W#1 DoublesJordan Korth / Sarah Robertson vs Ashley Wright / Chantel Vu1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMadison Milligan vs Michaela Riding6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPallavi Darbhamulla / Joyce Christensen vs Kristin Midyett / Diana Vogel6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-11vs Sports Mall-Team FunLost 02
L#1 DoublesJordan Korth / Sarah Robertson vs Trena Anderson / Lisa Armstrong3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJoyce Christensen / Pallavi Darbhamulla vs Shelly Kaihatu / Joy Miya2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.48
Enguun Narangerel
published 2.5
2.42
Madison Milligan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Andie Ranck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ashley Chestnut
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jordan Korth
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Joyce Christensen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kavitha Jayakumar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Enguun Narangerel
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
0%57%43%
2.48
2.5
Madison Milligan
60W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%73%27%
2.42
Andie Ranck
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Ashley Chestnut
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jordan Korth
4W–3L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joyce Christensen
9W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kavitha Jayakumar
18W–28L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.