Teams

WALKER-DCTRC

2025 Adult 18 & Over-DLT · Men 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-22vs Joel/Benson-CCCLost 23
L#1 DoublesKenneth McGee / Hunter McIntire vs Forrest Vinson / Wesley Tindall6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBen Folk vs Wesley Aldridge3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKenneth Milton / William Smith vs Jonathan Burchfield / Allen Pongetti6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKamron Daniels vs Caleb West4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBrian Andrus / James Shelley vs Jeff Lusk / Jordan Burchfield6-2, 6-0
2025-03-27vs Joel/Benson-CCCWon 41
W#1 DoublesKenneth McGee / Mike Columbus vs Forrest Vinson / Wesley Tindall6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMitchell McNeer vs Wesley Aldridge5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKamron Daniels / Kenneth Milton vs Jonathan Burchfield / John Joel6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBen Folk vs Jordan Burchfield6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoshua Walker / Hunter McIntire vs Jeff Lusk / Hunter Kovac6-0, 6-1
2025-03-06vs Joel/Benson-CCCWon 41
W#1 DoublesJoshua Walker / Mitchell McNeer vs John Joel / Allen Pongetti6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKenneth Milton vs Wesley Aldridge6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMike Columbus / Kenneth McGee vs Jonathan Burchfield / Kenner Purvis6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKamron Daniels vs Caleb West6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJames Shelley / William Smith vs Jeff Lusk / Eric Wicker6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Kenneth Milton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.08
Mike Columbus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Ben Folk
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.98
James Shelley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Mitchell McNeer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.76
Kamron Daniels
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Brian Andrus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Hunter McIntire
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kenneth McGee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenneth Milton
10W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Mike Columbus
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.08
3
Ben Folk
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
James Shelley
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Mitchell McNeer
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Kamron Daniels
19W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Brian Andrus
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Hunter McIntire
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kenneth McGee
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.