Teams

McKeel - PiF Loco 55

2025 Loudoun Adult 55 & Over Men · Loudoun Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesMajed Hamawy / John Long vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-28vs Tiong - Team CourtmastersWon 10
W#1 DoublesMurugavel Chengalvarayan / John Long vs John Qu / Edwin Donovan5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-21vs Rentsch - ChallengersWon 10
W#2 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Pedro Garcia vs Ted Kim / Ryan Poole7-5, 6-4
2025-06-19vs Tiong - Team CourtmastersLost 01
L#2 DoublesMajed Hamawy / James Stamps vs Jose Ricardo Cornista / Dante Paragas6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-06-12vs Rentsch - ChallengersWon 10
W#2 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Murugavel Chengalvarayan vs Ryan Poole / John Cummins6-3, 7-6
2025-06-07vs Tiong - Team CourtmastersLost 01
L#3 DoublesMurugavel Chengalvarayan / Majed Hamawy vs Edwin Donovan / John Qu6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Murugavel Chengalvarayan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.91
Tim Alford
published
3.46
James Stamps
published
3.22
Bahram Solhjou
published 3.5
3.12
Kevin McKeel
published 3.5
3.08
John Long
published
3.06
Chris Powers
published 3.5
3.01
Thomas McCrary
published
3.00
Majed Hamawy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Pedro Garcia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Long + Bahram Solhjou2444% games+0.9% vs expected
John Long + Tim Alford3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Murugavel Chengalvarayan
304W–111L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Tim Alford
29W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
James Stamps
35W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
Bahram Solhjou
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Kevin McKeel
90W–97L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.12
John Long
15W–25L career · no lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Chris Powers
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Thomas McCrary
43W–39L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Majed Hamawy
379W–516L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Pedro Garcia
26W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.