Teams

Innisbrook Spin Sisters

2025 Pinellas Combo 18 & Over Weeknight Fall · 6.5 W Tuesday EVE

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-25vs Innisbrook Drop Shot DivasLost 01
L#2 DoublesNoela Fries / Fayola Goldstone vs Veronica Sullivan / Kayla Churchill1-6, 1-6
2025-11-18vs Pinellas/Dsa/18&Over6.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Connolly / Fayola Goldstone vs Kenzier McIntyre / Kristina Faraci3-6, 2-6
2025-11-04vs Innisbrook Drop Shot DivasLost 12
L#1 DoublesLyn DeBoer / Christine Hueholt vs Lauren Robertson / Veronica Sullivan1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmie Rotz / Noela Fries vs Melissa Bryan / Patricia Aliak6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElise Hall / Gabriela Tanase vs Chloe Wiard / Tracia Danhour6-2, 6-3
2025-10-14vs Innisbrook Drop Shot DivasLost 01
L#3 DoublesFayola Goldstone / Lyn DeBoer vs Carol Bou-sliman / Tricia Lolkus1-6, 1-6
2025-10-07vs Pinellas/Dsa/18&Over6.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesFayola Goldstone / Lauren Aumond vs Eileen Rodriguez / Tiffany Hashem0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Tuesday EVE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Elise Hall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Christie Rock
published 3
2.93
Fayola Goldstone
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.90
Lisa Connolly
published
2.87
Noela Fries
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Amie Rotz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Lauren Aumond
published
2.78
Gabriela Tanase
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Christine Hueholt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Beverly Encarnacion
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Darienne Hidalgo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Lyn DeBoer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Connolly + Christie Rock7165% games+15.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elise Hall
23W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3
Christie Rock
18W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Fayola Goldstone
29W–38L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Lisa Connolly
18W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Noela Fries
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
3
Amie Rotz
22W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Lauren Aumond
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Gabriela Tanase
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Christine Hueholt
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Beverly Encarnacion
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
3
Darienne Hidalgo
8W–19L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
Lyn DeBoer
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.