Teams

SAgrawal (Blakeney)

2025 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-04vs KKuehner/Alexander (Life Time)Split 11
W#1 SinglesSandra Dickinson vs Raegan Wright6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaureen Polonus / Diane DeMus vs Amy Barclay / Amy Rottman1-6, 0-6
2025-04-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesJena Barton / Sandra Dickinson vs Kelly Thompson / Shannon Burke6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-08vs ACombs (BCC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesSandra Dickinson / Shikha Agrawal vs Carrie Baker / Vonda Huss7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDiane DeMus / Purnima Kunwor vs Rebecca Maietta / Lisa Short1-6, 4-6
2025-04-02vs PReimann (Matthews)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSandra Dickinson / Jena Barton vs Carrie Letorney / Carol Gress5-7, 2-6
2025-03-25vs JSmith (Raintree)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Dickinson / Mercedes Aycinena vs Diann Hickson / Nicole Love6-7, 6-7
2025-03-18vs KLee/SChandra (CTNC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSandra Dickinson / Lorena Giraldo vs Shruti Chandra / Mayela Magur1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDiane DeMus / Purnima Kunwor vs Kristi Lee / Vicki Greenway2-6, 4-6
2025-03-04vs TMagee/LDiman (Carmel)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesSandra Dickinson vs Katie O'Shea1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRadhika Jampani / Diane DeMus vs Jessica Babinski / Kylie Holt0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.64
Sandra Dickinson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.50
Shikha Agrawal
published
2.46
Kinnera Angadi
published
2.46
Lorena Giraldo
published
2.43
Alpana Patel
published 3
2.28
Radhika Jampani
published
2.09
Diane DeMus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.08
Purnima Kunwor
published
1.97
Maureen Polonus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Radhika Jampani + Lorena Giraldo134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sandra Dickinson
35W–44L career · 7 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Shikha Agrawal
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Kinnera Angadi
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%60%40%
2.46
Lorena Giraldo
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%63%37%
2.46
3
Alpana Patel
0W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.43
Radhika Jampani
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Diane DeMus
17W–75L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Purnima Kunwor
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Maureen Polonus
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.