Teams

Vitha, Dawn

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter 2.5W - 5.0 & Open · 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.78 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Ashton Sparks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.53
3.45
Jessie Pullins
published
3.45
Christy Saxer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Dawn Vitha
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Jennifer Hudson
published
3.34
Jennifer Schreiber
published
3.34
Bree Ginden
published 3.5
3.33
Christy Mayo
published 4
3.29
Julie Rome
published
3.26
Kari Lemons
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
Erin Atherton
published
3.21
Alice Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Hayley Hanson
published
3.18
Monique Marquette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Amy Kentfield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Molly Hunt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monique Marquette + Amy Kentfield4357% games+11.1% vs expected
Christy Saxer + Ashton Sparks5058% games+6.1% vs expected
Amy Kentfield + Christy Saxer5456% games+5.8% vs expected
Christy Mayo + Jennifer Hudson8352% games+4.2% vs expected
Kari Lemons + Dawn Vitha10656% games+4.0% vs expected
Amy Kentfield + Erin Atherton6157% games+3.5% vs expected
Jessie Pullins + Julie Rome3448% games+1.9% vs expected
Julie Rome + Christy Mayo5354% games+1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ashton Sparks
92W–17L career · 8 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
4
Brooke Chiaverini
40W–25L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Jessie Pullins
39W–31L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.45
4
Christy Saxer
76W–51L career · 4 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Dawn Vitha
103W–98L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.42
Jennifer Hudson
33W–21L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.39
Jennifer Schreiber
74W–68L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Bree Ginden
81W–54L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
4
Christy Mayo
32W–27L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.33
Julie Rome
35W–28L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Kari Lemons
119W–107L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Erin Atherton
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Alice Edwards
136W–101L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Hayley Hanson
45W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Monique Marquette
77W–57L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Amy Kentfield
88W–80L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Cassandra Schneeberger
55W–81L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Molly Hunt
32W–30L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.