Teams

Northern: Enterprise

2021 18&Over Men · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-31vs Puma 3.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesDayton King / Paul Hook vs Brijesh Tantuwaya / Donald Streeter6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRick Evans vs Ethan Hausamann2-6, 0-6
2021-07-24vs The Main Monkey Business 3.0Won 32
W#1 DoublesDayton King / Rick Evans vs Quentin Phung / James Mylod7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMike Clifford vs John Mastracchio2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Pawlows / Paul Hook vs NICHOLAS AMODIO / Edwin Rogers6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesKashi Prasad vs Jared Danaher5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGeorge Koh / DHARANI MURUNDI vs Philip Danaher / George Schlottner7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2021-07-10vs Puma 3.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesRick Evans / Dayton King vs Donald Streeter / Brijesh Tantuwaya6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesThomas Miller / Girish Ramanathan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGeorge Koh / Brent Smith vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-03vs The Main Monkey Business 3.0Won 32
W#1 DoublesDHARANI MURUNDI / Brent Smith vs Quentin Phung / Michael Klein6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMike Clifford vs Jodi Council6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesThomas Miller / Paul Hook vs Edwin Rogers / Thomas Gandrud6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesKashi Prasad vs Adrian Loghin5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesGirish Ramanathan / Dayton King vs Philip Danaher / George Schlottner4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-06-16vs Puma 3.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Pawlows / Brent Smith vs Donald Streeter / Brijesh Tantuwaya6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesThomas Miller / Paul Hook vs Jim Best / Charles Zarriello6-1, 6-3
2021-06-05vs The Main Monkey Business 3.0Split 22
W#1 DoublesBrent Smith / Michael Pawlows vs James Mylod / Thomas Gandrud7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKashi Prasad vs John Mastracchio2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesThomas Miller / Paul Hook vs George Schlottner / Philip Danaher6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesScott Dingman / George Koh vs Quentin Phung / Michael Klein2-5
2021-05-22vs Puma 3.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesThomas Miller / Brent Smith vs Fred Boehrer / William Newman6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesScott Dingman / Paul Hook vs Gordon Olson / Bob Schuman6-3, 7-6
2021-05-15vs The Main Monkey Business 3.0Won 32
W#1 DoublesMichael Pawlows / Kashi Prasad vs Philip Danaher / Jared Danaher6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGirish Ramanathan vs John Mastracchio1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesThomas Miller / Brent Smith vs Quentin Phung / Michael Klein6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDayton King vs Jodi Council3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDHARANI MURUNDI / Scott Dingman vs George Schlottner / Adrian Loghin6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Brent Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Rick Evans
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.94
Girish Ramanathan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.83
Paul Hook
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
Dayton King
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Mike Clifford
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.58
George Koh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
DHARANI MURUNDI
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kashi Prasad
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Michael Pawlows
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Scott Dingman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Hook + Thomas Miller121149% games+2.4% vs expected
George Koh + Girish Ramanathan4253% games−1.3% vs expected
Girish Ramanathan + Paul Hook404 matchesnot enough data
Girish Ramanathan + Thomas Miller224 matchesnot enough data
Girish Ramanathan + Mike Clifford213 matchesnot enough data
Dayton King + Rick Evans213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brent Smith
118W–41L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.93
3.5
Rick Evans
111W–51L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%31%69%
3.56
3
Girish Ramanathan
51W–39L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Paul Hook
68W–53L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Dayton King
15W–10L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mike Clifford
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
2.68
3
George Koh
25W–27L career · 2 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
2.58
DHARANI MURUNDI
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kashi Prasad
17W–22L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Pawlows
4W–0L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Scott Dingman
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Thomas Miller
70W–58L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.