Teams

BC-ErnieHowlett/NormaIskenderian

2024 Adult 65 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#3 DoublesMeredith Crooks / Shizuko Takayasu vs Huong Mary Lai / Colleen Johnson2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesLynn Abelson / Adele Slaughter vs Michele McGowan / Sherry Davidowitz3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMarion Doi / Lupe Lopez vs Nancy Gillespie / Barbara Hemmerich6-4, 7-6
L#1 DoublesLynn Abelson / Adele Slaughter vs Cheryl Williams / Barbara Hemmerich6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLupe Lopez / Marion Doi vs Huong Mary Lai / Paulette Mashaka6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMilagros Holub / Shizuko Takayasu vs Colleen Johnson / Diane Pryzbylo6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJady Vonderlieth / Shizuko Takayasu vs Huong Mary Lai / Paulette Mashaka4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSandra Nervig / Adele Slaughter vs Barbara Hemmerich / Nancy Gillespie6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLupe Lopez / Deborah Hurwicz vs Mary DeVlugt / Ann Garry7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLynn Abelson / Karen Barry vs Leslie Winston / Colleen Johnson6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Rie Miyake
published
3.61
Lupe Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Shizuko Takayasu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Milagros Holub
published
3.13
Adele Slaughter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Karen Barry
published
3.07
Lynn Abelson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Jady Vonderlieth
published
2.76
Deborah Hurwicz
published 3
2.74
Maggie Vaughan
published
Mina Jorgensen
published
Sandra Nervig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adele Slaughter + Shizuko Takayasu14454% games−3.4% vs expected
Lupe Lopez + Adele Slaughter033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rie Miyake
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
Lupe Lopez
149W–105L career · 3 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Shizuko Takayasu
129W–141L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.44
Milagros Holub
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Adele Slaughter
163W–167L career · 3 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
Karen Barry
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Lynn Abelson
49W–79L career · 3 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Jady Vonderlieth
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Deborah Hurwicz
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
Maggie Vaughan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.74
Mina Jorgensen
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Nervig
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.