Teams

Siri-Stafford Collective

2025 One Doubles · 3.0 Men

3 players · average NTRP 3.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
James Jaeger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.18
Jeff Perry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Joseph Siri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2025-07-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Perry / Matthew Majewski vs Tate Kuerbis / Thomas Griffin3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Jaeger / Joseph Siri vs Jason Floyd / Will Bayon6-4, 6-1
2025-07-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJeff Perry / Joseph Siri vs John Brady / Umang Patel2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-07-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Perry / Matthew Majewski vs Seung-Hee Bae / Jinhong Shin6-0, 6-1
2025-07-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoseph Siri / James Jaeger vs Brian Chenoweth / Kip Stevenson6-2, 6-0
2025-07-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Jaeger / Matthew Majewski vs Jared Rollier / Tate Kuerbis6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoseph Siri / James Jaeger vs Kerry Griffin / Douglas Brewer6-0, 6-1
2025-06-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew Majewski / Jeff Perry vs Scott Dickinson / Jason Floyd6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
James Jaeger
41W–18L career
0%3%97%
3.40
3.5
Jeff Perry
35W–16L career
3%97%0%
3.18
3
Joseph Siri
45W–38L career
0%91%9%
2.92

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.