Teams

LOS GATOS SR 40AW4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-20vs LOS PASEOS PK 40AW4.0AWon 40
W#1 DoublesKelly Nichols / Jennifer Roberts vs Mara Dumond / Yemia Hashimoto6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKristin Dillehay vs Jothi Murali2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesYuri Oda / Jane Doyle vs Katja Gagen / Sunny Wang6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Tuchler / Hagit Koren vs Stacie Pittenger / Terry Huang6-1, 6-2
2025-01-18vs LOS PASEOS PK 40AW4.0AWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Roberts / Kelly Nichols vs Cori Mehring / Lan Wu6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesWendy Riggs / Jane Doyle vs Mara Dumond / Snjezana Maric6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlba Levitas / Suzanne Tuchler vs Petra Grabinger / Stacie Pittenger3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Kelly Nichols
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Kristin Dillehay
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.87
Yuri Oda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Alba Levitas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Allison Risso
published 4
3.76
Melissa Neal
published
3.75
Wendy Riggs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Jane Doyle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Lauren Denevi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Ellen Hilbrich
published
3.25
Rebecca Wade
published
Hagit Koren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Suzanne Tuchler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Wade + Lauren Denevi4257% games+1.4% vs expected
Yuri Oda + Jane Doyle213 matchesnot enough data
Jane Doyle + Kristin Dillehay303 matchesnot enough data
Alba Levitas + Allison Risso123 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Nichols + Ellen Hilbrich303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Nichols
95W–57L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
Kristin Dillehay
27W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Yuri Oda
9W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Alba Levitas
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Allison Risso
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Melissa Neal
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Wendy Riggs
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Jane Doyle
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Lauren Denevi
39W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
Ellen Hilbrich
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.52
Rebecca Wade
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Hagit Koren
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Tuchler
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.