Teams

Indian Springs - Ara/Tom

2021 SPB Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0

3 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-05-08Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAllen Nathan / Michelle Nathan vs Scott Eagle / Jenna Young1-6, 2-6
2021-04-24vs Indian Springs - JoAnne/TriciaLost 02
L#1 DoublesAllen Nathan / Lori Kaplan vs Kyutae Lee / Donna Evertz2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Nathan / ARA TOROYAN vs Matt Corey / JoAnne Lyons5-7, 5-7
2021-04-17vs Palm Beach - Indian Springs/LorenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAllen Nathan / Marsha Grey vs Natalia Frantsevskaya / Sean Lowery2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Nathan / Moussa Hanna vs Mike Tichacek / Elisabeth Weiss6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2021-04-03vs Indian Springs - JoAnne/TriciaLost 12
W#1 DoublesJustin Zwolski / Lori Kaplan vs William Cascioli / Zaira Morales3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesARA TOROYAN / Michelle Nathan vs Kyutae Lee / JoAnne Lyons3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAllen Nathan / Pia Schedler vs Matt Corey / Tricia Vanloo1-6, 5-7
2021-03-27vs Palm Beach - Indian Springs/LorenWon 20
W#2 DoublesJustin Zwolski / Lori Kaplan vs Adam Pasternack / Andrea Cornelissen6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMoussa Hanna / Michelle Nathan vs Carlton Able / Stephanie Walbornn6-0, 6-3
2021-03-13vs Indian Springs - JoAnne/TriciaWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Nathan / ARA TOROYAN vs William Cascioli / Marie Ferrigno6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAllen Nathan / Marsha Grey vs Donna Evertz / Kyutae Lee4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJohnny Cisneros / Lori Kaplan vs Neil Stepman / Jennifer Wood6-2, 6-2
2021-03-06vs Palm Beach - Indian Springs/LorenLost 01
L#3 DoublesAllen Nathan / Lori Kaplan vs Shawn Chen / Andrea Cornelissen3-6, 2-6
2021-02-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesMoussa Hanna / Michelle Nathan vs Neil Stepman / Jennifer Wood6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Lori Kaplan
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.57
Michelle Nathan
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Allen Nathan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allen Nathan + Michelle Nathan1638% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lori Kaplan
139W–68L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.89
Michelle Nathan
41W–42L career · 7 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.57
Allen Nathan
1W–24L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.