Teams

River Strand Petersen

2025 Sarasota Adult 65 & Over Winter · 8.0 W Friday

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-14vs LBK Club BavelyWon 10
W#2 DoublesHattie Grimsley / Sharyn Quiros vs Linda Gillott / Ginger Griffith-Schirmer7-5, 7-6
2025-03-07vs LBK Public AitkenLost 01
L#2 DoublesLenore Funes / Jenny Sherr vs Karen Kurgan / Peggy Lavallee4-6, 2-6
2025-02-28vs Florida/Duncan/65&Over8.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesHattie Grimsley / Sharyn Quiros vs Avis Brodess / Judith Lubbers1-6, 0-6
2025-02-21vs LWR No Drama MamasLost 01
L#3 DoublesJenny Sherr / Helen Petersen vs Kathleen Torrell / Claudia Schwab2-6, 3-6
2025-02-14vs LBK Club BavelyLost 01
L#2 DoublesSharyn Quiros / Jenny Sherr vs Karen Byles / Ginger Griffith-Schirmer1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-01-17vs Florida/Duncan/65&Over8.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesLenore Funes / Jenny Sherr vs Constance Duncan / Kristine Fitts3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSharyn Quiros / Marsha Parrish vs Deanna Allard / Barbara Belanger6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Chris Poole
published 4
3.69
Penny Franklin
published
3.58
3.55
Hattie Grimsley
published 4
3.52
Jenny Sherr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Sharyn Quiros
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Susan Nicoletti
published
Leslie Adkins
published
Marsha Parrish
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Sherr + Sharyn Quiros2450% gamesnot enough data
Chris Poole + Marsha Parrish134 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Sherr + Susan Nicoletti314 matchesnot enough data
Chris Poole + Penny Franklin123 matchesnot enough data
Marsha Parrish + Penny Franklin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Poole
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Penny Franklin
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Barbara Aichinger
10W–18L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Hattie Grimsley
4W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jenny Sherr
261W–237L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Sharyn Quiros
96W–91L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Susan Nicoletti
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.31
Leslie Adkins
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marsha Parrish
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.